摘要
霍耐特在其理论形成过程中将福柯视为一位非常重要的理论家。在对福柯思想的阶段性考察的基础上,霍耐特不仅对福柯人种学根本立场的有效性表示怀疑,而且对福柯社会理论中权力分析的一元论困境做了深入的剖析。霍耐特从批判的社会理论发展史角度指出,尽管福柯以权力增强的系统论方式固然溶解了以阿多诺为代表的第一代批判理论"支配自然"的模式,但他还是未能为分析晚期资本主义的社会整合提供合适的工具——社会性概念。对福柯社会理论中权力一元论进行规范性转换,同时汲取他的"持续斗争"观点,霍耐特最终有可能将批判的社会理论带入新的视域和境界。
Axel Honneth regards Michel Foucault as one key theorist in the process of building his own theory. On the basis of general observation of Foucault’s theoretical periods of development, Honneth not only doubts about the efficiency of Foucault’s ethnology, but also makes an in-depth analysis of the monism dilemma of power analysis in Foucault’s social theory. From the perspective of the developing history of critical social theory, Honneth points out that although Foucault’s systematic approach of power-strengthening certainly dissolved the mode of "dominating nature" which derives from the first generation of critical theory represented by Theodor Adorno. However, he failed to provide a proper tool for analyzing the social integration of terminal capitalism, namely the Social Concept. Through the normative transformation of the monism of power in Foucault’s social theory and the absorption of his viewpoint of "continuous struggle", Honneth may finally bring the critical social theory into a new horizon and realm.
出处
《北方论丛》
2020年第5期32-38,45,共8页
The Northern Forum
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助——中国科学技术大学2017年度创新团队培育项目“马克思主义理论研究”(WK2111070006)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金“黄梅戏传统剧目文化研究”(WK2111070007)
安徽省社科基金一般项目“生存的记忆:黄梅戏传统剧目文化社会学研究”(AHSKY2018D56)的资助。
关键词
霍耐特
福柯
阿多诺
权力
规范
Axel Honneth
Michel Foucault
Theodor Adorno
Power
Norm
