摘要
根据《中国加入世贸组织议定书》的规定,确定中国出口产品正常价值的"替代国"方法理应于中国入世15年后终止。然而,这一带有歧视性质的做法迄今仍被美欧用于针对中国产品的反倾销调查程序中。为寻求新的法理依据,美欧在运用自身制定的标准宣布中国为非市场经济国家的同时,在世贸组织内联合起来向中国经济模式发起猛烈攻击,意图迫使中国按其所界定的市场导向条件标准作出根本转变,以削弱中国经济的竞争力。新一轮世贸组织市场导向之争的帷幕由此拉开。由于本轮斗争发生在中美战略竞争背景之下,这使得引发争论的问题本身和世贸组织改革都呈现出更加复杂和对立的色彩。虽然共识决策原则会限制美欧将其市场导向条件标准直接上升为世贸组织规则,但未来一段时期中国与美欧等主要贸易伙伴之间的贸易摩擦和冲突可能会有所增多,中国企业面临的风险和成本也会因此而提升。
According to the Protocol on the Accession of the People’s Republic of China,the"surrogate country"approach for determining the normal values of China’s exports shall be terminated in 15 years after China’s accession to the WTO.However,such discriminatory approach has been often used by Europe and USA for anti-dumping investigations against Chinese products.In order to seek new legal basis,USA and Europe have joined hands inside the WTO to initiate fierce attacks against China’s economic pattern besides announcing that China is a non-market economy country according to their own standards,so as to force China to make fundamental changes as per their market-oriented conditions and weaken the competitive power of Chinese economy.A new round of WTO market-oriented dispute has begun.As the dispute appears in the context of Sino-US strategic competition,both the issues that have triggered the dispute and the WTO reform have become more complicated and antagonistic.Although the consensus decision-making principle of WTO can prevent USA and Europe from directly changing their market-oriented conditions and standards into the WTO rules,the trade frictions and conflicts between China and its major partners from Europe and USA may increase in the future,making Chinese enterprises face ascending risks and costs.
作者
柯静
Ke Jing(the Institute of International Relations,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences)
出处
《国际关系研究》
CSSCI
2020年第3期89-112,M0006,M0007,共26页
Journal of International Relations
基金
上海市哲学社会科学规划青年项目“WTO体系改革的中国方案研究”(项目编号:2018EGJ004)的阶段性研究成果。
