期刊文献+

血清CEA、CA125联合CA199对晚期肝内胆管细胞癌患者预后的预测作用 被引量:8

Predictive Effect of Serum CEA,CA125 Combined with CA199 on Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原125(CA125)联合糖类抗原199(CA199)对晚期肝内胆管细胞癌(ICC)预后的预测作用。方法回顾性分析2015年1月~2018年1月医院收治的120例ICC患者的临床资料,根据随访1年内病情是否进展和死亡将患者分别纳入预后良好组和不良组;对比预后良好组和不良组患者血清CEA、CA125、CA199水平,并对比2组其他可能导致预后不良影响因素的差异,采用Logistic回归分析法明确相关危险因素;绘制受试者工作曲线(ROC),分析血清CEA、CA125、CA199检测及联合检测对晚期ICC患者预后不良的预测意义。结果随访1年内,共91例患者发生预后不良,其中72例死亡、19例进展生存,预后不良发生率为75.83%。预后不良组血清CEA、CA125、CA199水平高于预后良好组,且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组性别、年龄、肿瘤直径、合并肝炎、合并肝硬化、Child-Pugh分级、治疗方式、不同血AFP水平患者构成比比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),预后不良组多发肿瘤、低度分化、TBIL>171μmol/mL患者构成比均高于预后良好组,且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);经Logistic回归分析发现,CEA>9.67 ng/mL、CA125>93.23 U/mL、CA199>120.11 U/mL、多发肿瘤、低度分化、TBIL>171μmol/mL均是导致晚期ICC患者预后不良的独立危险因素(P<0.05);血清CEA、CA125、CA199预测晚期ICC患者预后不良最佳截断点分别为9.67 ng/mL、93.23 U/mL、120.11 U/mL;血清CEA、CA125、CA199联合检测预测预后不良的灵敏度、特异度和准确度均高于单独检测,且联合检测预测预后不良的AUC为0.832,高于单独检测。结论CEA、CA125、CA199与晚期ICC患者预后不良关系密切,且与单独检测血清CEA、CA125、CA199相比,联合检测3种血清学指标对晚期ICC患者预后预测价值更高。 Objective To investigate the predictive role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125)and carbohydrate antigen 199(CA199)in prediction of the prognosis of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC).Methods The clinical data of 120 patients with ICC in the hospital between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into good prognosis and poor prognosis according to the disease progression and time of survival in one year follow-up.Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the related risk factors.Subject working curve was drawn,and the predictive significance of serum CEA,CA125,and CA199 was analyzed.Results Ninety-one patients had poor prognosis,including 72 deaths and 19 survivals with disease progression.The incidence of poor prognosis was 75.83%,with high levels of serum CEA,CA125 and CA199(P<0.05).There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender,age,tumor diameter,hepatitis,cirrhosis,Child-Pugh classification,treatment methods as well as the blood AFP concentration(P>0.05).The independent risk factors for the patients with poor prognosis include multiple tumors,low differentiation and high TBIL≥171μmol/mL(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that elevated CEA(>9.67 ng/mL),CA125(>93.23 U/mL),CA199(>120.11 U/mL),and TBIL(>171 mmol/mL)and multiple tumors with low differentiation were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with advanced ICC(P<0.05).The best cut-off points of serum CEA,CA125 and CA199 for predicting poor prognosis were 9.67 ng/mL,93.23 U/mL and 120.11 U/mL,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of combined detections of serum CEA,CA125 and CA199 were higher than those of single detection,and the AUC of combined detection was 0.832,higher than that of single detection.Conclusion The serum levels of CEA,CA125 and CA199 are closely related to poor prognosis in patients with advanced ICC,and compared with the serum CEA,CA125 and CA199 detected alone,the serological indica
作者 李晓洁 慈雪萍 张俊 LI Xiao-jie;CI Xu-ping;ZHANG Jun(Lu'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,230076)
出处 《临床输血与检验》 CAS 2020年第4期434-439,共6页 Journal of Clinical Transfusion and Laboratory Medicine
关键词 癌胚抗原 糖类抗原125 糖类抗原199 晚期肝内胆管细胞癌 预后 Carcinoembryonic antigen Carbohydrate antigen125 Carbohydrate antigen 199 Advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献42

  • 1Deng, Fei-Tao,Li, Yan-Xu,Ye, Lun,Tong, Ling,Yang, Xiu-Ping,Chai, Xin-Qun.Hilar inflammatory pseudotumor mimicking hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2010,9(2):219-221. 被引量:2
  • 2麻勇,许军,代文杰.肝门部胆管癌诊治进展[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2005,17(4):343-346. 被引量:5
  • 3Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2002. Cancer J Clin,2005 ,55 :74. 被引量:1
  • 4Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evalua- tion criteria in solid tumours : revised RECIST guideline ( version 1. I ). Eur J Cancer,2009,45:228. 被引量:1
  • 5中国抗癌协会肝癌专业委员会.原发性肝癌临床诊断和分期标准.中华肝脏病杂志,2001,9:23. 被引量:1
  • 6Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to e- valuate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organiza- tion for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst ,2000,92:205. 被引量:1
  • 7Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Seminars in liver disease ,2010,30:52. 被引量:1
  • 8Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of canc- er treatment. Cancer, 1951,47:207. 被引量:1
  • 9Varela M, Real MI, Burrel M, et al. Chemoembolization of hepatocel- lular carcinoma with drug eluting beads:efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepato1,2007 ,46 :474. 被引量:1
  • 10Llovet JM, Di Biseeglie AM, Bruix J, et al. Design and endpoints of clinieal trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst,2008, 100 : 698. 被引量:1

共引文献124

同被引文献99

引证文献8

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部