摘要
为了探索中国市场化生态补偿的多元途径,本文重点研究了社区自然资源管理(CBNRM)与生态服务付费(PES)之间的关系,指出两者代表不同的制度逻辑:前者立足于集体产权下的社会规范,后者建基于产权明晰下的市场机制。为了弥合这种矛盾,在社区主导型PES机制设计和实施过程中"制度拼凑"不可或缺。制度拼凑是指在单一制度解构基础上的多种机制相互嵌入,对不同主体的利益和制度偏好的调和。本文通过对中国和日本的社区主导型生态补偿的典型案例分析,总结出制度拼凑可以分为权力折衷、利益共享和示范驱动三种类型,其实现路径一是通过主体间的谈判协商寻找制度和利益的均衡,二是建立强有力的领导者个人关系,三是通过资源拼凑获取可显示的实际成果,最终使外来PES项目获得本地合法性。本文强调了制度拼凑和资源拼凑在形成社区主导型PES机制中的适用性和条件性,对于我国构建市场化多元化的生态补偿体系具有重要参考意义。
In order to explore multiple ways of ecological compensation in China,this paper focus on the relationship between Community Natural Resource Management(CBNRM)and Ecosystem Service Payment(PES),and points out that although they represent different institutional logic,the contradiction can be overcomed by"Institutional Bricolage"and"Resource Bricolage".Typical case study,involving the process and mechanism of three PES in rural communities located in China and Japan were conducted.This paper concludes that the"institutional bricolage"include three types:Power compromise model,benefit sharing model and demonstration model.The approaches of institutional bricolage include:(1)Make adaptive institutional innovation through negotiation between the organizations,(2)Establish personal relationship between leaders,(3)Obtain local legitimacy through demonstrable achievement based on the resource bricolage.This paper emphasizes the conditionality of the institutional bricolage and the resource bricolage in the formation of communitybased PES mechanism,which is of great reference significance for China to design a multiple ecological compensation system.In the process of establishing multiple ecological compensation mechanism in China,compared with the relationship between the community and government which has been discussed a lot,the relationship between the community(CBNRM)and market(PES)has hardly been studied.
作者
张捷王
海燕
Zhang Jie;Wang Haiyan(l.Institute of Resources,Environment and Sustainable Development,Jinan University,Guangzhou,510632,China;Huashang College,Guangdong University of Finance and Economics,Guangzhou,511300,China)
出处
《公共管理学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第3期126-138,174,共14页
Journal of Public Management
基金
国家社科基金重大项目(15ZDA054)
广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划项目(2019GZGJ211)。
关键词
社区自然资源
生态服务购买
社会规范
制度拼凑
资源拼凑
Community Natural Resources
Payments for Ecosystem Services
Social Norms
Institutional Bricolage
Resource Bricolage
