摘要
《切韵》韵母表的排列法是一个复杂的问题。迄未见有人专门加以探讨。文章认为现有的方案可分为两种类型、五种模式。并依次探讨了传统型(含高本汉、赵元任、李荣三种模式)和创新型(含马丁、蒲立本两种模式)的诸家排列法,发现诸家各有所长,未可盲目定于一尊。对此,笔者提出了自己的初步看法。
The arrangement of the finals in Qie Yun(切韵) is a complicated problem, and no one has discussed it yet. This paper argues that the existing schemes can be divided into two types, namely traditional and innovative. This paper then explores the arrangement of five models among these two types, including three traditional models(e.g. Bernhard Karlgren, Y. R. Chao(赵元任), and Li Rong(李荣)) and two innovative models(e.g. Samuel Martin and E. G. Pulleyblank). It can be seen that each model has its own strengths, and all the arrangements are not blindly scheduled one. In this case, the authors put forward their preliminary views.
作者
冯蒸
王晓晖
FENG Zheng;WANG Xiao-hui(College of Literature,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100089,China)
出处
《语言研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期77-90,共14页
Studies in Language and Linguistics
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“北京方言形成的历史音韵层次研究”(17ZDA312)。
关键词
《切韵》韵母表排列法
传统型
创新型
五种模式
主要元音构拟
Arrangement of final system in Qie Yun(切韵) traditional type
Innovative type
Five models of reconstruction of the main vowel in Qie Yun(切韵)
