摘要
目前我国城市轨道交通的建设已进入快速发展的阶段,在轨道交通的可行性研究方案中,确定合理的车辆类型以及列车编组方案对整体方案设计具有重要的意义。与实际运营相匹配的列车编组方案不仅可以节省项目的工程投资、降低甲方的运营成本,而且还可以优化运输组织方案、提高系统的服务水平。以成都轨道交通13号线为例,通过采用综合比选的方法对不同系统制式的车型进行多角度的综合比选,最终确定A型车的适应性更好,在此基础上对A型车的站立标准、车门布置以及客流适应性进行分析,深入研究功能复合的超长线路列车的编组问题,结论为:本线初、近、远期采用8-4/8-4/8编组方案,即初期中心城区需采用8辆编组,市域段宜采用小编组列车,结合列车交路、客流适应性,近、远期采用4,8辆编组混跑或分段运营。
At present,the construction of urban rail transit in China has entered into a rapid development stage.It is of great significance to determine reasonable vehicle type and train formation plan for the overall project design in the feasibility study of rail transit.A train formation plan matching the actual operation can not only save the project investment and reduce the operation cost of the owner,but also optimize the transport organization plan and improve the system service level.With reference to Chengdu rail transit line 13 and in comparison with different system vehicle types from various perspectives based on comprehensive analysis and selection method,the better adaptability of the type A vehicle is proved.On this basis,the paper thoroughly studies the standing standard,the door layout,the passenger flow adaptability of the type A vehicle,and the formation of the super long train of functional composites.The paper concludes that in the near and long term,8-4/8-4/8 train formation plan should be adopted with 8-car trains in the initial central urban area,and small made-up trains in the urban area.Combining with the adaptability of train routing and passenger flow,4-car or 8-car mixed train operation or subsection operation should be adopted in the near and long term.
作者
周宏昌
王学贵
强士盎
安轲
吴明超
李岩辉
ZHOU Hongchang;WANG xuegui;QIANG Shiang;AN Ke;WU Mingchao;LI Yanhui(Shaanxi Railway and Underground Traffic Engineering Key Laboratory(FSDI),Xi’an 710043,China;Shaanxi Railway and Underground Traffic Engineering Key Laboratory(FSDI),Xian 710043,China)
出处
《铁道标准设计》
北大核心
2020年第7期68-75,共8页
Railway Standard Design
基金
中国铁建股份有限公司科技研究计划课题(2018-C38)。
关键词
城市轨道交通
功能复合
车辆选型
列车编组
综合比选
urban rail transit
functional composites
vehicle selection
train formation
comprehensive comparison and selection