期刊文献+

变频空调中国标准与欧盟标准能效计算差异研究 被引量:3

Energy efficiency difference of inverter air conditioners between Chinese standard and EU standard
下载PDF
导出
摘要 空调能效标准作为产品节能控制的有效手段,已被各国普遍采用,但因地理、经济水平等客观因素导致各国能效标准水平不一而足。针对欧盟能效标准EN 14825:2016与中国标准GB/T 7725—2004中规定的能效测试要求和计算方法的差异进行了理论分析,并通过实验验证了2种标准的能效值差异。结果表明:同一机型在欧盟标准和中国标准2种测试计算方法下,制冷、制热季节能效值欧盟标准分别比中国标准约高62%,20%;而能效等级判定中欧盟标准却比中国标准略低。 As an effective means of energy saving control of products,air conditioning energy efficiency standards have been widely adopted in many countries,but the level of energy efficiency standards varies due to objective factors such as geographic and economic.Performs a theoretical analysis of the differences in energy efficiency test requirements and calculation methods between the EU energy efficiency standard EN 14825:2016 and the Chinese standard GB/T 7725-2004,and verifies them through experiments.The results show that the SEER and SCOP of the EU standard is 62%and 20%higher than that of the Chinese standard respectively,and the energy efficiency level rated by the EU standard is lower than that rated by the Chinese standard for the same air conditioner.
作者 何佳璟 范建波 黄允棋 李玉婷 He Jiajing;Fan Jianbo;Huang Yunqi;Li Yuting(Laboratory of Airconditioning Equipment and System Energy Conservation,Zhuhai,Guangdong Province,China;不详)
出处 《暖通空调》 2020年第6期108-113,共6页 Heating Ventilating & Air Conditioning
关键词 能效标准 变频空调 制冷季节能效比(SEER) 全年性能系数(APF) 能效比(EER) energy efficiency standard inverter air conditioner seasonal energy efficiency ratio(SEER) annual performance factor(APF) energy efficiency ratio(EER)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献9

共引文献20

同被引文献19

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部