摘要
依据《食品安全法》第148条的规定,食品安全惩罚性赔偿责任的构成要件之一是食品不符合食品安全标准。就如何理解《食品安全法》第148条所称的“食品安全标准”,司法实践中存在形式标准说和实质标准说两种观点。这两种观点均存在其合理之处和有待商榷之处,在解释食品安全标准这一概念时,应当将二者予以整合:食品安全标准是指形式标准或实质标准,即二者的并集。对于食品安全惩罚性赔偿责任,消费者既可以食品不符合形式标准主张之,也可以食品不符合实质标准主张之。
According to Article 148 of the Food Safety Law of China,one reason that causes the liability of punitive damages for food safety is that food doesn’t comply with food safety standard.There are two theories on how to understand"food safety standard"mentioned in Article 148 of the Food Safety Law:the formal standard theory and the substantive standard theory.Both theories have their rationality and deficiency.When explaining the concept of food safety standard,two theories shall be integrated:food safety standard refers to formal standard or substantial standard.With regard to the liability of punitive damages for food safety,consumers can claim it does not comply with formal standard or substantial standard.
作者
汪梦晗
WANG Meng-han(School of Law,China Jiliang University)
出处
《标准科学》
2020年第6期31-36,共6页
Standard Science
基金
国家社科基金项目“私法的自然法方法”(项目批准号:15KFX001)资助。
关键词
食品安全法
惩罚性赔偿
食品安全标准
形式标准
实质标准
Food Safety Law
punitive damage
food safe standard
formal standard
substantial standard
