摘要
行政诉讼原告资格问题的核心在于标准的确定。从直接利害关系标准到利害关系标准的规则变迁,体现了对行政诉讼功能认知的逻辑延展。最高人民法院相关典型案例的里程碑意义,在于凸显对行政诉讼功能的逻辑认知,走向制度实践的诉讼操作。本文认为,基于我国行政诉讼原告资格制度的发展趋势以及理论认知与实践运行的现实状况,以保护规范理论为逻辑依托的规则设计,由于其在界定"利害关系"含义上的模糊性及解释方法上的有限性,应当谨慎适用。
The core of the plaintiff’s qualification in administrative litigation lies in the determination of the standard. The change of the rule from direct interest standard to interest standard reflects the logical extension of the functional cognition of administrative litigation. The landmark significance of the relevant typical cases of the Supreme People’s Court lies in its highlighting the logical cognition of the function of administrative litigation and moving towards the litigation operation of the system practice. This paper, based on the development trend of the practice of the plaintiff qualification system in administrative litigation and the reality of the theoretical cognition and practice in China, holds that the design of rules logically based on the theory of protection norms should be carefully applied, because of the fuzziness in defining the meaning of "interest" and the limitation in the interpretation method.
作者
刘泽军
张爽
LIU Zejun;ZHANG Shuang(School of Humanities and Law,North China University of Technology,100144,Beijing,China)
出处
《北方工业大学学报》
2020年第3期20-27,共8页
Journal of North China University of Technology
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“公法争议与公法救济研究”(16JJD820001)。
关键词
行政诉讼
原告资格
保护规范理论
the administrative litigation
the plaintiff qualifications
protection norm theory
