摘要
当下我国刑法的立法模式呈现单一"法典化"的特征,试图以"法典化"模式规制各种犯罪,但在体系与内容上具有不可避免的局限性,故构建多元化立法模式才符合未来的发展趋势与历史潮流。以"二元立法模式"实现对我国刑法立法模式的改造也并非最佳选择,因为该模式在体系与内容上都存在不缜密之处,使得在理论建构和实践操作上都大打折扣。故应实行刑法典、单行刑法与附属刑法三者并立的"三元立法模式"机制,并赋予其新的内涵,进一步拓展"三元立法模式"的优势,最大程度地实现我国刑法的固有价值。同时在刑法之外建构"微罪体系",以达至互补,进一步推动我国刑法立法的科学化。
At present, the legislative model of criminal law of China is in pursuit of a single code, which tries to regulate all kinds of crimes through codification. However, since the model has limitation in its system and content, it is in line with the future trends to construct a diversified legislative mechanism. To be more specific, the dualistic mechanism is not the most appropriate legislative model, for the reason that the system and content are not careful, so that the theory construction and practical operation are greatly reduced. Instead, it is suggested to implement the tree-element legislative mechanism:the criminal code, the separate criminal law and the accessory criminal law, which may give the new connotation to the criminal law and maximize its intrinsic value. Besides, a misdemeanor system should be constructed to supplement the penalty system, thus further promoting the rationality of criminal law legislation.
作者
李晓明
Li Xiao-ming(Kenneth Wang Law School of Soochow University,Suzhou Jiangsu 215000)
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第3期23-36,共14页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
2017年国家社科基金重大项目“网络金融犯罪的综合治理”(17ZDA148)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
立法模式
法典化
二元立法模式
三元立法模式
微罪体系
legislative model
codification
dualistic legislative model
tree-element legislative model
petty misdemeanpr system
