期刊文献+

美国政治极化与对华政策的极端化 被引量:8

American Political Polarization and Extremalization of Its China Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国总统特朗普执政以来,美国两党的斗争异常激烈,政治极化程度之深为近几十年来所罕见,有学者甚至称其为"超级极化"。面对政治极化及其背后的深层问题,美国总统特朗普为巩固执政权威、两党政客为解决国内经济问题,都将对华强硬作为优先事项。美国部分学术界精英等提出为了凝聚人心和强化国家认同,呼吁与中国开展新冷战。这股强大的力量与中美两国结构性矛盾趋于尖锐一起,共同推动了美国对华政策的极端化。但与中国对抗无法缓解美国激烈的党争,难以改善其国内的不平等问题,也解决不了美国国家认同面临的长期挑战。美国要走出政治极化,需要共和党或民主党通过选民重组获得对另一方的压倒性优势,从而长期主导政治议程。未来美国的党争还会非常激烈,但不管其国内政治如何演进,美国对华强硬的趋势都很难改变。 Since President Trump came into power,the bipartisan fights has been unprecedentedly fierce, giving rise to a depth of political polarization unseen in the US for decades. As a result, some scholars even called it "super polarization". Faced with political polarization and deep-seated issues behind it, both President Trump and politicians from the two parties have prioritized getting tough with China, either to consolidate his ruling authority or to address economic issues at home. Some elites in American academic circle have called for a new Cold War with China in order to increase cohesion and consolidate national identity in America. This powerful force, prompted by intensifying structural contradictions between the US and China, has led American policy toward China to extremes. Nevertheless, confronting China cannot mitigate the fierce bipartisan fight in the US, nor can it resolve the issue of inequality in American society, letting alone responding to the challenge long facing American national identity. To get America out of political polarization, either the Republican Party or the Democratic Party has to gain an overwhelming advantage over the other party through realigning voters so as to dominate political agendas for long. In future, the bipartisan fight in America will remain fierce. However, no matter how domestic politics evolves in the US, it will be hard to change the trend of getting tough with China.
作者 张文宗 Zhang Wenzong(Institute for American Studies,CICIR;the Center for Taiwan Studies,CICIR)
出处 《和平与发展》 CSSCI 2020年第2期40-55,131,132,136-142,共25页 Peace and Development
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献71

  • 1周琪.美国的政治腐败和反腐败[J].美国研究,2004,18(3):45-68. 被引量:42
  • 2Barbara Sinclair, "Congressional Parties and the Policy," in L. Sandy Maisel ed. , The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 2002), p. 211. 被引量:1
  • 3Barbara Sinclair, Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making, p. 5. 被引量:1
  • 4Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher eds. , Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era (Washington, D. C. : CP Press, 2000), pp. 3-4. 被引量:1
  • 5Norman J. Ornstein, Thomas E. Mann, and Michael J. Malbin eds. , Vital Statistics on Congress, 1993 1994 (Washington D. C. : CQ Press, 1994), pp. 201-202. 被引量:1
  • 6Bruce Miroff, Raymond Seidelman and Todd Wwanstrom eds. , The Democratic Debate: An Introduction to American Politics (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002), p. 309. 被引量:1
  • 7Nolan McCarty, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal eds. , Polarized American: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (MIT Press, 2006), p. 15. 被引量:1
  • 8William G. Mayer, The Divided Democrats: Ideological Unity, Party Reform, and Presidential Election (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1996), pp. 96-97. 被引量:1
  • 9Pietro S. Nivola and David W. Brady, eds. , Redand Blue Nation, p. 16. 被引量:1
  • 10David M. Shribman, "Subtle Shifts," in L. Sandy Maisel ed. , The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 2001), p. 296. 被引量:1

共引文献70

引证文献8

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部