摘要
目的探讨中药周期疗法对轻、中度宫腔粘连患者中医证候及宫腔粘连程度的影响。方法选取2017年3月~2019年3月我院收治的100例轻、中度宫腔粘连患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组(50例)和观察组(50例)。对照组患者采用西药治疗,观察组患者在此基础上联合采用中药周期疗法,两组均治疗3个月经周期。比较两组患者的临床疗效、治疗前后中医证候及宫腔粘连程度积分。结果观察组患者的治疗总有效率(94.00%)高于对照组(80.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的中医证候积分均低于治疗前,且观察组的中医证候积分[(12.54±4.23)分]低于对照组[(23.67±6.95)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的宫腔粘连程度积分均低于治疗前,且观察组的宫腔粘连程度积分[(1.46±0.62)分]低于对照组[(2.23±0.93)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对轻、中度宫腔粘连患者采用中药周期疗法有助于改善患者症状,促进其宫腔恢复,疗效高于西药治疗。
Objective To investigate the effect of Chinese medicine cycle therapy on traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) syndrome and degree of intrauterine adhesion in patients with mild and moderate intrauterine adhesion. Methods A total of 100 patients with mild and moderate intrauterine adhesion admitted to our hospital from March 2017 to March 2019 were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into the control group(50 cases) and the observation group(50 cases) according to the random number table method. Patients in the control group were treated with Western medicine, and patients in the observation group were combined with Chinese medicine cycle therapy on that basis. Both groups were treated for 3 menstrual cycles. The clinical efficacy, TCM syndrome and degree of intrauterine adhesion scores before and after treatment were compared between the two groups of patients. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group(94.00%) was higher than that in the control group(80.00%), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). After treatment, the TCM syndrome scores in the two groups of patients were lower than those before treatment, and the TCM syndrome score in the observation group([12.54±4.23] points) was lower than that in the control group([23.67±6.95] points), with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). After treatment, the degree of intrauterine adhesion scores in the two groups of patients were lower than those before treatment, and the degree of intrauterine adhesion score in the observation group([1.46 ±0.62] points) was lower than that in the control group([2.23±0.93] points), with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). Conclusion The use of Chinese medicine cycle therapy for patients with mild and moderate intrauterine adhesion can improve the symptoms and promote the uterine cavity recovery of patients. The curative effect is higher than that of Western medicine.
作者
吴虑
WU Lv(Department of Pharmacy,Jiujiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Jiangxi Province,Jiujiang332000,China)
出处
《中国当代医药》
2020年第11期160-162,166,共4页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
宫腔粘连
中药周期疗法
中医证候
宫腔粘连程度
Intrauterine adhesion
Chinese medicine cycle therapy
Traditional Chinese medicine syndrome
Degree of intrauterine adhesion
