摘要
中国艺术史学科虽然自成立以来就遭受质疑,但也不难予以合理的回应:西方的艺术史正在从艺术门类史而变得越来越具有艺术门类综合性和文化多元性;中国自身的文化、学术及艺术传统本身则具有艺术史书写的动力。中国艺术史学科的可能性来自于两方面:艺术史学科制度建立本身,中国式门类艺术汇通及古今学术汇通传统。艺术史学科路径可以有门类艺术史、宽视角门类艺术史、观念艺术史、比较艺术史、跨门类综合艺术史等。对艺术史学科路径的反思可能引导出艺术史学--对艺术史研究方法或路径的反思。中国艺术史学科可以由三个分支构成:艺术通史,跨门类、跨媒介或跨学科的艺术史,艺术史学。
Although the discipline of Chinese art history has been questioned since its establishment,it is not difficult to comply with a reasonable response:western art history is becoming more and more comprehensive and culturally diverse from a historical study of different art categories,and China’s cultural,academic and artistic traditions have their own motives for writing art history.The disciplinary potentiality of Chinese art history lies in two aspects:firstly,the establishment of the discipline system itself;secondly,the Chinese-style integration of art categories and academic traditions.There are various paths of the art history discipline,such as history of art categories,history of art categories with a broader perspective,conceptual art history,comparative art history,as well as cross-category and comprehensive art history.The reflection on the disciplinary paths of art history may lead to the art historiography-a retrospection on the methods or paths of art history research.The discipline of Chinese art history is composed of three branches:general history of art,inter-media or inter-disciplinary art history,and art historiography.
作者
王一川
WANG Yichuan(The Center for Studies of Literary Theories,School of Chinese Language and Literature,BNU,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第3期42-49,共8页
Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“文艺发展史与文艺高峰研究”(18ZD02)。
关键词
中国艺术史学科
跨门类艺术史
跨学科艺术史
艺术史学
the discipline of Chinese art history
inter-category art history
inter-disciplinary art history
art historiography
