摘要
我国合同法第五十二条第五项规定"违反法律、行政法规的强制性法规"的合同无效,实践中将涉犯罪合同违反刑法规范等同于"违反法律的强制性规定"有明显的逻辑和释义缺陷。以民间借贷的三种合同类型进行分析,对涉犯罪合同效力问题从法理和解释结论的正当性方面进行考证,得出其"并不当然无效"的结论,只有通过合同法及与其他私法领域规范相结合,才能对此类案件作出正确认定。
Article 52 of the contract law of our country Item 5 of Article 52 in China’s Contract Law stipulates that contract with"compulsory regulations in violation of laws and administrative regulations"shall be invalid.In practice,the contracts-related violation of the norms of criminal law is identified with the"violation of the mandatory provisions of the law",which is obviously defective in logic and interpretation.Analysis of three types of nongovernmental loans-related contracts and textual research on crime-involved contract validity in terms of the legitimacy of jurisprudence and explanatory conclusions result in a conclusion that its invalidity is not taken for granted.Only through combination of the contract law with other private law norms can such cases be correctly identified.
作者
张慧
成功
ZHANG Hui;CHENG Gong(School of Law and Public Management,Hunan Technology and Business University,Changsha 410295,China)
出处
《广西警察学院学报》
2020年第2期14-21,共8页
Journal of Guangxi Police College
关键词
涉犯罪合同
合同效力
强制性法规
crime-involved contract
contract validity
mandatory provisions of the law
