期刊文献+

大学生连续创业团队绩效反馈研究:教育博弈与管理启示 被引量:1

Performance Feedback of Undergraduates Serial Entrepreneurial Team:Educational Game and Managerial Implications
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从概念内涵、反馈类型、过程机理、影响因素探究大学生连续创业团队的现状,重点分析由此引发的四种教育博弈,即场域博弈、结构博弈、主体博弈和资源博弈,研究发现:通过机制保障可以实现组织协同,通过课程设计可以实现创业教育;而以实践育人理念坚守初心、以立德树人理念升级"双创",则可以为高校实践育人、创新育人提供策略,同时也为创业组织管理部门提供更多思路借鉴。 The status of undergraduates serial entrepreneurial team is explored in terms of its defining connotation,feedback types,process mechanism and influence factors.The exploration focuses on four kinds of educational game triggered,that is,field game,structure game,subject game and resources game.It is found that a stable mechanism can secure the organizational collaboration,that the success of entrepreneurial education can be achieved through curriculum design,and that practice-based education adhering to the notion of cultivating talents preconditioned by moral education can offer paths and strategies to the organizational departments of college entrepreneurial education.
作者 巫程成 WU Chengcheng(Tourism College of Zhejiang,Hangzhou 311231,Zhejiang,China)
出处 《扬州大学学报(高教研究版)》 2020年第2期73-79,共7页 Journal of Yangzhou University(Higher Education Study Edition)
基金 教育部人文社科项目“供给侧改革背景下农业龙头企业技术创新的激励机制研究”(16YJA790057) 浙江省高等教育“十三五”教学改革研究项目“创业学习视角下的创新创业教育驱动与调节机制探究”(jg20180595) 2016年浙江省教育厅科研项目“风险框架情境下大学生连续创业团队绩效反馈路径探究”(Y201635297) 2019年浙江旅游职业学院院级科研项目“高校大学生连续创业团队绩效反馈研究:教育博弈与管理启示”(2019JGYB02)。
关键词 大学生创业 连续创业团队 绩效反馈 教育博弈 entrepreneurship of college students serial entrepreneurial team performance feedback educational game
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献140

  • 1刘嘉,许燕.团队异质性研究回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(4):636-640. 被引量:52
  • 2张平.国外高层管理团队研究综述[J].科技进步与对策,2006,23(7):197-200. 被引量:27
  • 3Yazici, H.J. A study of collaborative learning style and team learning performance. Education & Training, 2005,47:216 - 229. 被引量:1
  • 4Paiincsar, A.L. Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 1998, 49:345 - 375. 被引量:1
  • 5Gillies, R. M. The Behaviors, Interactions, and Perceptions of Journal High School Students During Small - Group Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, 95(1): 137- 147. 被引量:1
  • 6Schwarz, B. B., Neuman Y. Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2003, 12(2): 219-256. 被引量:1
  • 7Saleh M, Lazonder A W & Jong T D. Structuring collaboration in mixed - ability groups to promote verbal interaction, learning, and motivation of average - ability students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2007,32 : 314 - 331. 被引量:1
  • 8Barton, B. Achieving coordinalion incollaborative problem - solving groups. The Journal of the Leafing Sciences, 2000, 9(4): 403- 436. 被引量:1
  • 9King , A. Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem - solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991, 83(3): 307- 317. 被引量:1
  • 10King A. , Staffieri A. & Adelgais A. Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to ~affold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1998, 90 ( 1 ) : 134 - 152. 被引量:1

共引文献293

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部