期刊文献+

加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省高等教育质量保证过程审核制度及其特点——以对不列颠哥伦比亚大学的审核为例 被引量:3

The Quality Assurance Process Audit System and its Characteristics in Higher Education in British Columbia in Canada——Taking the Audit of the University of British Columbia as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 质量保证过程审核是加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省对大学内部质量保证过程的外部审核性评估,旨在改进大学个性化的质量保证过程。以“过程”而非“质量”为评价对象,巧妙平衡了社会问责与学术自治的对立诉求,拉近了外部与内部对大学质量保证的观念认同。深入探析这一制度及其对不列颠哥伦比亚大学的过程审核,并凝练其可资借鉴的特点,可以为解决大学质量评估难以及标准化评估所带来的大学同质化、功利性和负担重等问题提供新视角。 The Quality Assurance Process Audit(QAPA)is an external audit assess?ment of the university's internal quality assurance process in province of British Columbia in Canada,aiming at improving the university's personalized quality assurance process.Taking"process"instead of"quality"as the assessment object balances opposing demands of social accountability and academic autonomy,and draws closer the identity of quality as?surance between external and internal of the university.Conducting an in-depth analysis of the QAPA system and the audit of the quality assurance process of the University of British Columbia,and then summarizing its reference characteristics can provide new perspectives to solve the problems of university quality assessment difficulties and university homogenei?ty,utilitarianism as well as heavy burdens issues caused by standardization assessment.
作者 高宗泽 GAO Zongze(Institute of International and Comparative Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China)
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第1期87-102,共16页 Studies in Foreign Education
基金 教育部国外教育调研专项、国家留学基金管理委员会资助项目“建设世界一流大学的政策及评价机制研究”(资助编号:201808220219)。
关键词 加拿大 高等教育 质量保证 过程审核 评估制度 Canada higher education quality assurance process audit assessment system
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献48

  • 1Currie,J.. Globalizing practices and university responses: European and Anglo-American differences [M] Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 2Romzek,B. S.. Dynamics of public sector accountability in an era of reform [J]. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2000,66:21-44. 被引量:1
  • 3Trow, M.. Trust,markets and accountability in higher education: A comparative perspective [J]. Higher Education Policy, 1996,9 (4): 309-324. 被引量:1
  • 4Huisman,J. & Currie,J.. Accountability in higher education: Bridge over troubled water? [J]. Higher Education, 2004,48: 529-551. 被引量:1
  • 5Vidovich, L.. Quality assurance in Australian higher education: Globalization and "steering at a distance" [J]. Higher Education, 2002,43: 391-408. 被引量:1
  • 6Pick,D.. The Re-framing of Australian Higher Education [J]. Higher Education Quarterly,2006,60 (3): 229-241. 被引量:1
  • 7Harvey,L. & Askling,B.. Quality in Higher Education[A]. Begg,R. (ed.). The dialogue between higher education research and practice [ C ]. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. 69-83. 被引量:1
  • 8Marginson,S.. Re-thinking academic work in the global era [J]. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2002,22(1): 23-35. 被引量:1
  • 9Martin,L.. Tertiary education in Australia: Report of the Committee on the Funding of Tertiary Education in Australia [ R]. Canberra:Commonwealth of Australia, 1965. 被引量:1
  • 10Marginson. S.. Education and public policy in Australia [M]. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 被引量:1

共引文献25

同被引文献8

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部