摘要
《剑桥中国文学史》呈现出与传统中国文学史显著的差异性,主要体现在叙述体例的革新、经典的解构和重构、对物质文化的重视以及语言风格四个层面。《剑桥中国文学史》是西方“文学文化史”观及后现代主义、解构主义在文学史编撰中的有效实践。“文学文化史”观对中国当代文学史的书写产生了重要影响,20世纪80年代中国“重写文学史”的主张一定程度上即是对西方文学史观的呼应。中国本土文学史尤其是现当代文学史的书写,开始从“文学文化史”的视角对传统意义上的文学史进行改革、创新、解构和重构。
The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature presents significant differences from the traditional Chinese literature history,which are mainly reflected in the innovation of narrative style,the deconstruction and reconstruction of classics,the emphasis on material culture,and the language style.The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature is the effective practice of the views of western"literary cultural history",postmodernism,and deconstructionism in the compilation of literature history.The academic"literary cultural history"thought has created an important influence on the writing of contemporary Chinese literature history,and in the 1980s,Chinese academics′claim of"rewriting literature history"was a response to the Western literary history conception.The writing of native Chinese literature history,especially of modern and contemporary Chinese literature history,began to reform and innovate,deconstruct and reconstruct the traditional literature history from the perspective of"literary cultural history".
出处
《中州学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第3期159-165,共7页
Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
关键词
《剑桥中国文学史》
中国文学史
文学文化史
重写文学史
后现代主义
The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature
Chinese literature history
literary cultural history
rewriting literature history
postmodernism
