摘要
文章试论后写文化时代,美国人类学家乔治·马库斯教授人类学探索诸成果的学理扼要和逻辑关联,认为其提起的"类民族志"概念至关重要,谅可进一步拓展充实为全球化与数智时代因应互构的重要民族志范式,进而提起与科学民族志、反思民族志范式并列的"类民族志范式"假说,简述其对建构前瞻的中国灾害人类学等学科的意义。
This paper focuses on a series of theoretical essentials and logical connections proposed by the American Anthropologist George E. Marcus in the Post-Writing Culture Era. It holds that the Para-ethnography is a concept of great significance that could be further expanded and enriched as a central ethnographic paradigm responding to mutual construction in the era of digital intelligence and globalization. The paper also raises the hypothesis of "Para-ethnographic Paradigm" which is juxtaposed with scientific ethnography and reflective ethnographic paradigm, and briefly presents its significance in the construction of anthropology of disaster in China.
作者
阮云星
崔若淋
RUAN Yun-xing;CUI Ruo-lin(Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310000,China)
出处
《广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期21-25,共5页
JOURNAL OF GUANGXI MINZU UNIVERSITY:PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION
基金
浙江大学“双脑计划”交叉创新团队项目“赛博格人类学:人工智能与智识生产”
浙江大学文科教师教学科研发展专项项目“赛博文化时代的人类学研究”。
关键词
民族志
数智时代
共谋
类民族志范式
中国灾害人类学
ethnography
digital-intelligent era
complicity
para-ethnographic paradigm
anthropology of disaster in China
