摘要
目的:探索体外自动除颤仪与人工除颤在急性心肌梗死心脏骤停急救中应用价值分析.方法:选取2018年1月~2019年11月在本院进行急性心肌梗死心脏骤停急救的95例患者.急性心肌梗死心脏骤停患者被归类为体外自动除颤仪组(观察组,n=51):采用体外自动除颤仪方案治疗;人工除颤组(对照组,n=44):采取人工除颤方案治疗.比较两组患者的除颤成功率及存活率.结果:①经过治疗发现体外自动除颤仪方案患者除颤成功率对比人工除颤方案具有明显优势,P<0.05.②经过治疗发现体外自动除颤仪方案患者存活率对比人工除颤方案具有明显优势,P<0.05.结论:采用体外自动除颤仪方案治疗患者的效果确切,对比除颤成功率及存活率等方面有明显的优势,关于治疗后的长期效果该研究未进行深入探讨,存在一些不足,有待进一步研究.
Objective:To explore the application value of external automatic defibrillator in emergency treatment of acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest.Methods:From January 2018 to November 2019,95 patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest were selected.Patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest were classified into the external automatic defibrillator group(experimental group):51 patients were treated with the external automatic defibrillator program;44 patients in the artificial defibrillator group(control group)were treated with the artificial defibrillator program.The defibrillation success rate and survival rate of the two groups were compared.Results:①After treatment,it was found that the success rate of external automatic defibrillator was significantly higher than that of artificial defibrillator(P<0.05).②After treatment,it was found that the survival rate of the patients with external automatic defibrillator was significantly better than that with artificial defibrillator(P<0.05).Conclusion:The effect of external automatic defibrillator is accurate,and the success rate and survival rate of defibrillation have obvious advantages.The long-term effect of the treatment has not been further explored,there are some deficiencies,which need to be improved here.
作者
穆欣
MU Xin(Department of Emergency Medicine,Xinmin People’s Hospital,Liaoning Shenyang 110300)
出处
《中国医疗器械信息》
2020年第5期104-105,共2页
China Medical Device Information
关键词
体外自动除颤仪
人工除颤
急性心肌梗死
存活率
external automatic defibrillator
artificial defibrillation
acute myocardial infarction
survival rate
