摘要
1995年召开的第四次世界妇女大会将反家庭暴力话语带到了中国,这次大会开启了中国反家庭暴力立法的历史进程。基于多方面原因,反家庭暴力话语进入中国后形成了三种不同的立法叙事。民间组织的立法叙事强调家庭暴力的社会性别根源和反家庭暴力的国家责任。妇联的立法叙事强调对受暴妇女权益的保护和对家庭稳定的维护。国家的立法叙事强调反家庭暴力对社会和谐稳定的重要意义。不同立法叙事之间的互动,充分体现在三类主体的立法过程和立法文本当中。然而,这三种叙事并非泾渭分明、一成不变,它们相互交叠绾合,在不同场合分别或同时出现,并最终演变为一个"复合性"的话语结构。这种"复合性"的话语结构有利于决策者维持社会转型时期的相对稳定,有利于社会不同群体之间实现思想的交流与融合。
The Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995, firstly introducing anti-domestic violence discourses to China, initiated the legislative history of this issue. For a variety of reasons, there are three seemingly contradictory legislative narratives after the anti-domestic violence discourse enters China. NGO has emphasized the gender root of domestic violence and human rights responsibility of the state;the Women’s Federation has stressed to protect rights of abused women and maintained family stability;and the state has emphasized the importance of anti-domestic violence to social harmony and stability. The game of legislative value and political position among different subjects is fully reflected in the legislative process and legislative texts of three kinds of subjects. However, these three kinds of narratives are not clear-cut and unchangeable. They overlap each other, appear separately or at the same time in different occasions, and eventually evolve into a"compound"discourse structure. The structure is beneficial for policy makers to maintain social stability in the period of social transformation and conducive to the exchange and integration of different ideas among different social groups.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期188-206,共19页
Law and Social Development
基金
浙江农林大学科研发展基金人才启动项目(2014FR055)的阶段性成果。
关键词
反家庭暴力立法
民间组织
妇联
国家
三重叙事
Anti-domestic Violence Legislation
NGO
the Women’s Federation
State
Three Narratives
