摘要
环境司法专门化的发展与环境行政监管不力之间并非此消彼长的关系。在现代环境法框架内,司法介入与行政监管之间应该形成权力制衡与功能互补的关系,中国环境司法专门化应以此为基本的功能定位。环境司法专门化的本质属性在于回应针对环境问题的生态利益诉求,生态利益诉求可分为私益性的和公益性的两个基本类型,这决定了环境司法专门化的展开路径。回应私益性的生态利益诉求,应拓展传统环境侵权诉讼的功能,识别和回应以“美好”为取向的私人生态利益诉求。回应公益性的生态利益诉求涉及环境公益诉讼的定位,应确保环境民事公益诉讼不与环境行政监管形成竞争关系,并使环境行政公益诉讼聚焦于对行政机关履行法定职责的督促。
The relationship between the development of environmental judicial specialization and the ineffective environmental administrative supervision is not contradictory.In the framework of modern environmental law,the relationship between judicial intervention and administrative supervision should form the balance of power and complementary function,which should be the basic functional orientation of China′s environmental judicial specialization.The essence of environmental judicial specialization is to respond to the demands of ecological interests on environmental issues.The demands of ecological interests can be divided into two basic types:private interests and public interests,which determines the development path of environmental judicial specialization.In response to the demands of private ecological interests,we should expand the functions of traditional environmental tort litigation,identify and respond to the demands of private ecological interests oriented to"good".Responding to the demands of public ecological interests involves the positioning of environmental public interest litigation,we should ensure that environmental civil public interest litigation does not form a competitive relationship with environmental administrative supervision,and make environmental administrative public interest litigation focus on the supervision of administrative organs to perform their legal duties.
出处
《中州学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期38-47,共10页
Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“整体系统观下生物多样性保护的法律规制研究”(19ZDA162)。
关键词
环境司法专门化
环境行政监管
生态利益诉求
environmental judicial specialization
environmental administrative supervision
ecological interest demand
