摘要
普通的民事诉讼已有一定的职权主义色彩。立法者对公益诉讼结果的正确性应有更高要求,法官在审理过程中可能需评估未来的事实,现行法对救济方式缺乏具体规定,强制执行具有持续性且需执行机构深度介入,所以,公益诉讼更应采职权主义。现行法关于公益诉讼的部分规定虽呈现出较强的职权主义,但却违反了平等原则。平等的职权主义在释明、依职权调查证据、判决内容的确定等方面都应有所体现。
Ordinary civil litigation has a certain color of judicial activism.Legislators should have higher anticipation on the quality of outcome of public interest litigation.The judge may be required to assess future facts in the trial process.There are no specific provisions of remedy judgment enforcement requiring continuous and deep involvement of the court.For these reasons,public interest litigation should adopt the judicial activism.Although some current rules of public inter est litigation have shown strong judicial activism,it violates the principle of equality.Equal judicial activism should be re flected in many ways,such as elucidation,sua sponte investigation of evidence,and determination the concrete content of the judgment.
作者
严仁群
YAN Ren-qun(Law School,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)
出处
《江苏行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期119-126,共8页
The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
基金
南京大学人文社科双一流建设百层次项目“民事实体法和民事诉讼法的关系”
2019年国家社科基金重大招标项目“南海疆文献资料整理中的知识发现与维权证据链建构研究”的阶段性成果。
关键词
民事公益诉讼
职权主义
平等原则
civil public interest litigation
judicial activism
principle of equality
