期刊文献+

英美中专利体系之威慑手段和救济措施的比较

Comparative Patent Deterrence and Remedies in the Patent System of the United Kingdom,the United States and China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 专利制度目前已经成为国内保护发明人合法利益,鼓励创新,推动社会进步的重要一环。随着人们对专利重视程度的提升,伴随着市场竞争的加剧,专利侵权问题也日趋严峻。如何防范恶意侵权的发生,在侵权发生后如何对专利权人进行合理救济成为专利领域关注的重点。本文通过对英国、美国和中国专利体系中威慑手段和救济措施进行比较,以期对今后国内相关的制度建设提供参考。 The patent system has now become an important part of protecting the legitimate interests of inventors,encouraging innovation and promoting social progress.With the intensification of market competition,the issue of patent infringement has become increasingly serious.The patent fi eld members try to fi nd a way to prevent the occurrence of malicious infringement,and also to make reasonable remedies to the patentee while the infringement occurred.This paper compares the deterrence and remedies in the patent systems of the United Kingdom,the United States and China,hope to provide reference to the domestic construction.
作者 刘豫川 LIU Yuchuan(Patent Examination Cooperation Sichuan Center of the Patent Office,CNIPA,Chengdu 610213)
出处 《中国发明与专利》 2019年第S02期138-143,共6页 China Invention & Patent
关键词 专利 侵权 威慑 救济 patent infringement deterrence remedy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献178

  • 1Dan B. Dobbs, Handbook on the Law of Remedies, St. Paul, MN: West Group (1973) , p. 204. Charles T. McCormick, Handbook on the Law of Damages, West Pub. Co. (1935) , p. 275. 被引量:1
  • 2John Y. Gotanda : Punitive Damages : A Comparative Analysis, 42 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2004, pp. 391 - 444. 被引量:1
  • 3Volker Behr, PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN AMERICAN AND GERMAN LAW-TENDENCIES TOWARDS APPROXIMATION OF APPARENTLY IRRECONCILABLE CONCEPTS, 78 Chi. -Kent L. Rev. (2003), pp. 105 - 161. 被引量:1
  • 4Ernet C. Stief- el: 'U. S. Punitive Damage Awards in Germany' , 39 The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1991, p. 784 o. 被引量:1
  • 5See, e. g, Octonia Trading, Ltd. v. Stinnes Interoil GmbH, SMA No. 2424 (1987) ; TriumphTankers, Ltd. v. Kerr McGee Ref. Corp, SMA No. 2642 (1990). 被引量:1
  • 6Harvey McGregor, McGregor on Damages, Sweet & Maxwell (lgth ed. 1980), pp. 309- 311, 326, 327. 被引量:1
  • 7F. H. Lawson & Harvey Teff, Remedies of English Law, Butterworths (1980), p. 133. 被引量:1
  • 8Harry Street, Principles of the Law of Damages, Kessinger Publishing (1962), pp. 28 -29. 被引量:1
  • 9F. H. Lawson & Harvey Teff, Remedies of English Law, p. 135 (1980). 被引量:1
  • 10Harry Street, Principles of the Law of Damages pp. 28 - 29 (1962). 被引量:1

共引文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部