摘要
文章在将城市福利分为户籍福利和非户籍福利的基础上,基于熵值法构建了城市福利水平评价指标体系,对全国288个地级以上城市的福利水平进行了测算。结果发现,户籍福利和非户籍福利都随城市规模的增大而增大,不同规模城市的福利差距很大,少数特大城市的非户籍福利水平高于其他城市户籍福利和非户籍福利的总和。城市福利的这种结构性差异对人口迁移产生了重要影响:农业转移人口宁愿到特大城市作非户籍居民,也不愿意到中小城市作户籍居民,特大城市即使严控户籍,也无法改变人口膨胀的态势。因此,特大城市人口疏解不应靠户籍管制,而应致力于缩小不同规模城市之间的福利水平差距。
This paper divides urban welfare into registered-household welfare and non-registered-household welfare,and constructs the evaluation index system of urban welfare level based on entropy method,calculating the welfare level of 288 prefec⁃ture-level cities in China.The results show that both the registered-household benefit and the non-registered-household benefit increase with the size of the city,and the welfare gap of different scale cities is very large.The level of non-registered-household welfare in a few megacities is higher than the sum of registered-household welfare and non-registered-household welfare in other cities.Such structural differences in urban welfare have an important impact on population migration:agricultural migrants would rather go to mega-cities as non-registered residents than to small and medium-sized cities as registered-household residents.Even if mega-cities strictly control household registration,they can not change the trend of population expansion.Therefore,the population distribution of mega-cities should not rely on household registration control,but should be committed to narrowing the welfare level gap between cities of different sizes.
作者
邹一南
崔俊富
Zou Yinan;Cui Junfu(Economics Teaching and Research Department,Party School of the Central Committee of C.P.C,Beijing 100091,China;School of Economics and Management,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China)
出处
《统计与决策》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期40-43,共4页
Statistics & Decision
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目(15CJL033)
关键词
户籍福利
非户籍福利
熵值法
人口迁移
registered-household welfare
non-registered household welfare
entropy method
population migration
