摘要
检察机关提起单独民事公益诉讼和提起刑事附带民事公益诉讼是民刑交叉公益案件办理的两种基本模式,而后者已成为当前公益诉讼起诉案件办理的最主要模式。通过对"检答网" 190个关于"刑事附带民事公益诉讼咨询"的实证分析发现:在制度供给不足的背景下,检察机关在办理刑事附带民事公益诉讼案件时,法律援引和适用不统一的情况普遍存在,诉前公告、证据、诉讼请求等具体问题矛盾较为突出。破解这种局面,首先,要调整公益诉讼制度的顶层设计,在不断完善刑事附带民事公益诉讼的基础上促进单独起诉与附带起诉两种办案模式协同发展;其次,发挥检察机关在办理民刑交叉公益案件办理中的主导责任,根据案件的具体情况做好单独起诉与附带起诉的程序分流;最后,无论适用哪一种诉讼模式,检察机关都应当做好刑事检察与公益诉讼检察的衔接工作。
Raising separate civil public interest litigation and incidental civil public interest litigation attached to criminal law are the two basic modes for procuratorial organs to handle public interest cases with both civil and criminal affairs and the latter has become the most important mode of handling public interest litigation cases at present.Through the empirical analysis of 190 cases of“Public Interest Litigation Consultation on Criminal Incidental Civil Matters”on JIANDA network,we can find that,under the background of insufficient supply of the system,when the procuratorial organ handles the case of the civil public interest litigation attached to criminal law,the situation of inconsistency of law citation and application is common,and the contradiction of specific problems such as pre-litigation announcement,evidence and litigation request is more prominent.To solve these problems,first of all,we should adjust the top-level design of the public interest litigation system,and promote the coordinated development of the two kinds of case handling modes of separate prosecution and incidental prosecution on the basis of constantly improving the civil public interest litigation attached to criminal law.Secondly,we should give full play to the leading responsibilities of procuratorial organs in handling public interest cases with civil and criminal affairs,and do a good job of separating the procedures of separate prosecution and incidental prosecution according to the specific conditions of the cases.Finally,no matter which litigation mode is applied,procuratorial organs should do a good job in the connection between criminal prosecution and public interest litigation.
作者
许瑛
钟剑煌
Xu Ying;Zhong Jianhuang
出处
《法治社会》
2020年第1期116-126,共11页
Law-Based Society
基金
广东省汕头市人民检察院申请的2019年度最高人民检察院检察应用理论研究课题“生态环境和资源保护领域刑事检察与公益诉讼检察衔接机制研究”的阶段性研究成果
关键词
刑事附带民事公益诉讼
检答网
检察机关
诉讼模式
主导责任
Civil Public Interest Litigation Attached to Criminal Law
JIANDA Network
Procuratorial Organs
Litigation Mode
Leading Responsibility
