期刊文献+

统计学视角下“大学英语写作”教学学术构建的反思

Reflection on the Academic Construction of College English Writing Teaching from the Perspective of Statistics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在对英语写作教学学术反思过程中,利用统计学原理,重视数据收集与挖掘,使用推断性统计,分析实际操作与理论需求样本量难于确定等问题。通过现代统计分析方法,削弱"理性"威胁,明确反思的目标,找准英语写作与统计方法的切合点,实现大学生英语写作能力的提升。 For the reflection of English writing teaching from the perspective of statistics, it is necessary to concentrate on overcoming the insufficient collection and representation of data, pursuing inferential statistics instead of being limited to descriptive statistics, and removing the difficulty of the sample scale caused by the inharmonious interaction between the actual operation and theoretical requirements. Therefore, teaching reflection contributes to diving into the modern statistical analysis to weaken the "rational" threat, and identifying the convergence between English writing and statistics by clarifying the objectives of reflection. Reliable objective effects can be obtained with scientific reflection methods;and the maximum improvement in English writing ability of college students can be attained with continuous teaching exploration and practice.
作者 陈睿 张栋栋 CHEN Rui;ZHANG Dong-dong(School of Foreign Languages,Fuyang Normal University;Division of National Defense Education,Fuyang Normal University,Fuyang 236037,Anhui,China)
出处 《韶关学院学报》 2019年第11期79-82,共4页 Journal of Shaoguan University
基金 安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目“EFL英语演讲认知语用趋近构式研究”(SK2019A0338) 安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目“基于对话句法理论的辩论体构式研究”(SK2018A0277) 上海外语教育出版社外语类委托项目“文化翻译视域下的《习近平谈治国理政》英译本研究”(SK2017A1070)
关键词 英语写作 教学反思 学术性教学 统计方法 English writing teaching reflection academic teaching statistical method
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献56

  • 1Laurie Richlin. Scholarly Teaching and the Scholarship of Teaching[J]. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001 (8). 被引量:1
  • 2Boyer, Ernest L Scholarship Reconsidered. Priorities of the Professoriate[R]. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990. 被引量:1
  • 3Michael B. Paulsen. The Relation Between Research and the Scholarship of Teaching[J].New Directionfor Teaching and Learning ,2001(8). 被引量:1
  • 4Hutchings,Pat,ed. The Ethics of Inquiry: Issues in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2002. 被引量:1
  • 5Glassick, Charles E. , Mary Taylor Huber, and Gene I. Maeroff. Scholarship Assessed : Evaluation of the Professoriater[J]. 1997. 被引量:1
  • 6Trigwell K, Martin E, Benjamin J, Prosser M. Scholarship of teaching: A model [J]. Higher Education Research and Development, 2000, 19: 155-168. 被引量:1
  • 7Atkinson M P. The scholarship of teaching and learning: Reconceptualizing scholarship and transforming the academy [J]. Social Forces, 2001, 79: 1217-1230. 被引量:1
  • 8Clarkv T N. Institutionalization of innovation in higher education: four models [G]//Baldridge J V. Academic governance: research on institutional politics and decision making. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, 1971:75. 被引量:1
  • 9Curry B K. Institutionalization: the final phase of the organizational change process[J]. Administrator's Notebook, 1991, 35(1). 被引量:1
  • 10Braxton J M, Luckey W, Helland P. Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer's four domains[J]. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 2002, 29(2). 被引量:1

共引文献153

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部