摘要
Sperber与Wilson提出反讽的回声提述论,认为某话语之所以成为反讽,一个必要的语义条件是该话语必须为解释性表征中的提述性用法,而且是回声式提述。文章以语料事实为依据,探讨了回声提述视角下反讽的识别和解读、反讽语力产生的限制性条件,总结了三类回声提述相互之间的关系以及影响回声认定的相关变量,最后指出回声提述论的局限性。
To interpret the mechanism underlying ironical utterance,Sperber and Wilson put forward Echoic-Mention Hypothesis,which holds that an indispensable semantic prerequisite for ironical utterance is the adoption of echoic mentioning as a way of interpretive representation.Based on Chinese corpus in practical use,this thesis,from the perspective of"Echoic-Mention",probes into the identification and interpretation of ironical utterance,as well as the restrictive conditions for the ironical power.In addition,the thesis summarizes inter-relations between the three types of Echoic-Mention and the variables affecting the identification of"echoes"before summing up the limitations of Echoic-Mention Hypothesis.
作者
罗钱军
LUO Qian-jun(Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai;Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages,Shaoxing)
出处
《汉语学习》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期56-64,共9页
Chinese Language Learning
关键词
反讽性话语
回声提述
解释性表征
语用非真诚性
ironical utterance
Echoic-Mention Hypothesis
interpretive representation
pragmatic insincerity
