摘要
目的对比观察尿激酶溶栓治疗面部微注射玻尿酸致眼动脉阻塞、视网膜动脉阻塞(RAO)及自发性RAO的临床效果。方法回顾性研究。2014年1月至2018年2月在西安市第四医院眼科住院治疗的面部注射玻尿酸致眼动脉阻塞、RAO患者22例22只眼(玻尿酸组)纳入研究。选择自发性RAO 22例22只眼作为对照组。所有患者采用国际标准视力表检测BCVA,并将结果转换为logMAR视力记录;采用FFA测量臂-视网膜循环时间(A-Rct)及视网膜主干-分支末梢充盈时间(FT);同时行颅脑MRI检查。两组患者年龄及FT比较,差异有统计学意义(t=14.840、3.263,P=0.000、0.003);logMAR视力、发病时间和A-Rct比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.461、0.107、1.101,P=0.647、0.915、0.277)。排除溶栓治疗禁忌后,所有患者行尿激酶溶栓治疗。其中玻尿酸组、对照组患者各有6例经滑车上动脉逆行眼动脉溶栓、6例经颈内动脉顺行眼动脉溶栓、10例采用静脉溶栓。治疗后24 h复查FFA,记录A-Rct及FT;治疗后30 d复查视力。观察患者治疗中及治疗后不良反应发生情况。对比观察两组患者治疗前后logMAR视力及A-Rct、FT的改变情况,并行t检验。结果治疗后24 h,玻尿酸组患者A-Rct、FT分别为(21.05±3.42)、(5.05±2.52)s,较治疗前明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(t=4.569、2.730,P=0.000、0.000);对照组患者A-Rct、FT分别为(19.55±4.14)、(2.55±0.91)s,较治疗前明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(t=4.114、7.601,P=0.000、0.000)。两组患者治疗后24 h A-Rct比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.311,P=0.197);FT比较,差异有统计学意义(t=4.382,P=0.000)。两组患者治疗后A-Rct、FT较治疗前的缩短时间比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.330、0.510,P=0.743、0.613)。治疗后30 d,玻尿酸组、对照组患者logMAR视力分别为0.62±0.32、0.43±0.17,均较治疗前改善,差异有统计学意义(t=2.289、5.169,P=0.029、0.000)。两组患者治疗后logMAR视力比较,差异有统计�
Objective To compare the clinical effects of urokinase thrombolytic therapy for optic artery occlusion(OAO)and retinal artery occlusion(RAO)caused by facial microinjection with hyaluronic acid and spontaneous RAO.Methods From January 2014 to February 2018,22 eyes of 22 patients with OAO and RAO caused by facial microinjection of hyaluronic acid who received treatment in Xi'an Fourth Hospital were enrolled in this retrospective study(hyaluronic acid group).Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients with spontaneous RAO were selected as the control group.The BCVA examination was performed using the international standard visual acuity chart,which was converted into logMAR visual acuity.FFA was used to measure arm-retinal circulation time(A-Rct)and filling time of retinal artery and its branches(FT).Meanwhile,MRI examination was performed.There were significant differences in age and FT between the two groups(t=14.840,3.263;P=0.000,0.003).The differecens of logMAR visual acuity,onset time and A-Rct were not statistically significant between the two groups(t=0.461,0.107,1.101;P=0.647,0.915,0.277).All patients underwent urokinase thrombolysis after exclusion of thrombolytic therapy.Among the patients in the hyaluronic acid group and control group,there were 6 patients of retrograde ophthalmic thrombolysis via the superior pulchlear artery,6 patients of retrograde ophthalmic thrombolysis via the internal carotid artery,and 10 patients of intravenous thrombolysis.FFA was reviewed 24 h after treatment,and A-Rct and FT were recorded.Visual acuity was reviewed 30 days after treatment.The occurrence of adverse reactions during and after treatment were observed.The changes of logMAR visual acuity,A-Rct and FT before and after treatment were compared between the two groups using ttest.Results At 24 h after treatment,the A-Rct and FT of the hyaluronic acid group were 21.05±3.42 s and 5.05±2.52 s,which were significantly shorter than before treatment(t=4.569,2.730;P=0.000,0.000);the A-Rct and FT in the control group were 19.55±4.14 s an
作者
雷涛
王润生
李娟
潘京京
李佩君
王静
王毅
郑轶
杜善双
吕沛霖
Lei Tao;Wang Runsheng;Li Juan;Pan Jingjing;Li Peijun;Wang Jing;Wang Yi;Zheng Yi;Du Shanshuang;Lyu Peilin(Department of Ophtalmology,Xi'an Fourth Hospital,Xi’an 710004,China)
出处
《中华眼底病杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2019年第6期593-598,共6页
Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases
关键词
视网膜动脉闭塞/药物疗法
血栓溶解疗法
透明质酸
眼动脉阻塞
面部注射
Retinal artery occlusion/drug therapy
Thrombolytic therapy
Hyaluronic acid
Ophthalmic artery obstruction
Facial injections
