摘要
在分析马克思主义者看来,马克思、恩格斯的道德观念与他们的意识形态理论之间存在一种阐释悖论——意识形态的虚假性、扭曲性与无产阶级道德的合法性的矛盾。佩弗通过切割道德观念与意识形态的关联性来为无产阶级道德观念辩护,虽然其得出道德不是虚假的意识形态因此不必被拒斥的结论,但这一结论已经背离了历史唯物主义的基本观点。尼尔森意图在承认道德观念与意识形态的关联性前提下重新定义意识形态,但其对道德观念的语境主义阐释又滑向了道德相对主义,由而从另一个层面背离了历史唯物主义。因此,消解这一“悖论”一方面要避免陷入分析马克思主义学派的认识误区,把握意识形态概念的多层次内涵并重申历史唯物主义内蕴的道德批判之维,另一方面需要从历史唯物主义的基本观点出发为无产阶级的道德观念作出正面辩护,并以历史辩证法呈现道德观念与意识形态关系演变的具体样态。
For analytical Marxists,there is an interpretative paradox between Marx and Engels'morality and their ideological theory:the contradiction between ideological falsity,distortion and the legitimacy of proletarian morality.Peffer defends the proletarian morality by disconnecting moral point of view from ideology.Although his conclusion is that morality is not a false ideology and therefore need not be rejected,this conclusion has deviated from the basic views of historical materialism.Nielsen intends to redefine ideology on the premise of acknowledging the relevance between morality and ideology,but his contextualism interpretation of morality slides into moral relativism,thus deviating from historical materialism from another level.Therefore,to eliminate this“paradox”,we should avoid falling into the misunderstanding of analytical Marxism,grasp the multi-level connotations of ideology and reiterate the dimensions of moral criticism inherent in historical Materialism.Moreover,we need to defend the proletariat's morality from the basic concepts of historical Materialism and present the concrete patterns of the evolution of the relationship between morality and ideology with historical dialectics.
作者
吴家华
施钰
WU Jiahua;SHI Yu(School of Marxism of Anhui University,Hefei,Anhui,230601)
出处
《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期11-21,共11页
Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目“第二国际马克思主义哲学重大问题论争研究”(14AZX001)
