摘要
我国商业秘密的法定构成要件包括秘密性、价值性和保密性,而侵犯商业秘密的认定则采用“相同或者实质相同”的标准。由于商业秘密司法实践的复杂性,加之审判程序本身的保密性,商业秘密的秘密性要件及侵犯商业秘密的认定标准仍存在较大的不确定性。本文从立法价值取向、创新程度及保护力度等方面进行分析,认为商业秘密的秘密性认定宜采用类似专利法的新颖性标准。而侵犯商业秘密的认定宜采用与专利等同侵权认定类似、但更为宽松的标准。
The statutory constituent elements of China's trade secrets include secrecy,value and confidentiality,while the infringement assessment of trade secrets adopts a criteria of"the same or substantially the same".Due to the complexity of the judicial practice of trade secrets,and the confidentiality of the trial procedure itself,the criteria for secrecy elements of trade secrets and infringement of trade secrets still have large uncertainties.This paper analyzes from the aspects of legislative value orientation,innovation degree,protection intensity,etc.,and believes that the secrecy of trade secrets should adopt the novelty criteria similar to the patent law,while the infringement assessment of trade secrets should adopt a similar but more lenient criteria as that of the patent equivalent infringement.
作者
寇飞
KOU Fei(Beijing NTD Law Offi ce,Beijing 100031)
出处
《中国发明与专利》
2019年第11期95-99,共5页
China Invention & Patent
关键词
商业秘密
秘密性
新颖性标准
实质相同
trade secrets
secrecy
novelty criteria
substantially the same
