摘要
通过批判韦伯以及维特根斯坦的相关见解可以发现,虽然人文学科研究的主体和对象都有厚重的非认知价值负载,但鉴于需要将事实与价值联结起来的枢纽作用以及认知需要与非认知需要的微妙异同,主体不仅可能、而且应当将自己的非认知需要悬置起来,纯粹基于认知需要如实描述作为存在事实的人文现象,从而使人文研究包含严格意义上的科学内容,然后再通过非认知价值重载的转型过程,为证成各种意识形态或人生理念提供实然性的基础。
Through a critical analysis of Weber and Wittgenstein's insights,it can be argued according to the linking role of the need between fact and value and the subtle similarities and differences between cognitive and non-cognitive needs that although the both subjects and objects of the humanities always have heavy non-cognitive value-loads,the subjects still can not only but also should suspend their non-cognitive needs and merely describe the truth of various cultural phenomena as the fact purely out of their cognitive needs or curiosity.In this sense,it is totally possible for the humanities researches to contain the“scientific”content in a strict sense and to provide factual bases for the justification of various ideologies or humanistic concepts through the transformation of value-reload.
作者
刘清平
LIU Qingping(Fudan Institute of Advanced Study in Social Sciences,Fudan University,Shanghai,200433China;School of Humanities,Wuhan College of Communication,Wuhan,Hubei,430205China)
出处
《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第4期1-8,共8页
Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
关键词
韦伯
维特根斯坦
人文研究
科学
价值中立
认知需要
Weber
Wittgenstein
humanities research
science
value-neutrality
cognitive need
