期刊文献+

自然保护区管理有效性评价方法比较 被引量:1

Comparison of evaluation methods for management effectiveness of nature reserves
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文采用国内外常用的三种自然保护区管理有效性评价方法,对赤水桫椤国家级自然保护区进行了评价,并对三种方法的评价结果进行了比较。2010年七部门联合工作采用的《国家级自然保护区管理工作评估赋分表》更适用于快速评价和多个保护区横向比较;国家林业局《自然保护区有效管理评价技术规范》对自然保护区现状的评价综合而细致,贴近中国的实际管理现状;而世界银行/世界自然基金会开发的《保护地区管理有效性跟踪工具》强调与周边宏观生态环境的关联与保护区的持续变化,因此适用于对保护区的长期持续监督与评估。 Three commonly used methods for evaluating the management effectiveness of natural reserves at home and abroad were used to evaluate the Chishui Alsophila National Natural Reserve, and the evaluation results of the three methods were compared. the Assessment Tables adopted by seven departments in 2010 are more suitable for rapid evaluation and horizontal comparison of multiple nature reserves. The National Forestry Administration’s Technical Specification comprehensively and meticulously evaluates the current situation of nature reserves, which is close to the actual management situation in China. METT by World Bank/WWF emphasizes more on the relationship with the surrounding ecosystem and the continuous changes of protected areas, so it is suitable for the long-term monitoring and evaluation of protected areas.
作者 邱如稚 梁盛 何琴琴 吴洪英 Qiu Ruzhi;Liang Sheng;He Qinqin;Wu Hongying(Guizhou Provincial Environmental Science Research and Design Institute, Guiyang Guizhou 550081,China;Guizhou Chishuiyu National Nature Reserve Administration, Chishui Guizhou 564700,China)
出处 《环境与发展》 2019年第10期25-26,29,共3页 Environment & Development
关键词 自然保护区 管理有效性评价 管理有效性跟踪工具(METT) Nature reserve Management effectiveness evaluation Mett
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献71

共引文献147

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部