期刊文献+

不同法域之间违法性判断的关系 被引量:16

Illegality Judgment’ Relationship between Different Legal Areas
原文传递
导出
摘要 不同法域之间违法性判断的关系问题,牵涉到如何认识法秩序的统一性、刑法的从属性观念要否坚持、"问题的思考"与"体系的思考"该怎样结合等诸多重大疑难问题,在刑法解释论上具有重要的价值。就此,存在违法一元论与违法相对论的对立。缓和的违法一元论一方面主张违法性一元,另一方面坚守刑法的谦抑性与补充性,得到了广泛支持。但是,其不能阐明法秩序整体与统一的目的何在,难以同时顾及目的的统一性与不同法域目的的独特性,一般的违法性概念的实质价值并不存在,理论与实务中无需也不会采取"一般的违法性+可罚的违法性=刑事违法性"的二重判断,因此并不可取。违法相对论顺应了不同法域间违法性目的-内容的差异性,其对规范目的进行批判性考察的思考方式与法秩序统一性要求相契合,既有利于摒弃刑法从属性观念、树立刑法的独立性格,也有助于妥当处理刑法与其他法域的实体与程序关系,因而值得提倡。 The relationship of illegality judgment between the different legal areas has important value in the interpretation of criminal law for involving how to understand the unity of legal order, whether the notion of criminal law’s being submissively should be persisted, how to combine "problem thinking" and "system thinking", and many other major difficult problems. At this point, there exists the opposition of illegality monism and illegality relativity. Eased illegality monism has been widely supported because on the one hand it stands for the illegal monism, on the other hand it adheres the modesty and complementary of criminal law. But, it can not explain what is the integrated and unified purpose of legal order, it is difficult to take the unity of purpose and the uniqueness of different law areas into account at the same time, the substantive value of the concept of general illegality does not exist, and in theory and practice, it is not necessary and will not to take the double judgment of "general illegality + punishable illegality=criminal illegality". Therefore it is not desirable. Illegality relativity conforms to the purpose-content difference of illegality between the different legal areas, the way of thinking about the critical investigation of the legal norms purpose is in agreement with the requirement of the unity of legal order. It is not only conducive to abandon the notion of criminal law’s being submissively and establish the independent character of criminal law, but also helps to properly deal with the entity and procedure relationship between criminal law and other legal areas. So it is worth promoting.
作者 王骏 WANG Jun(Law School,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing Jiangsu 210023,China)
出处 《法学论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期64-77,共14页 Legal Forum
基金 作者主持的2014年度国家社科基金项目《财产保护的刑法介入问题研究》(14BFX041)的阶段性成果
关键词 法秩序统一性 不同法域 违法性判断 违法的相对性 刑法独立性 unity of legal order different legal areas illegality judgment illegal relativity independence of criminal law
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献170

共引文献790

同被引文献255

引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部