摘要
户口违约金条款在我国存在不同辖区法院不同判决、同一辖区不同法院不同判决、同一法院不同年份不同判决以及不同争议性质不同判决的司法实践。各地、各级法院在户口违约金争议上的裁判不一源于我国现行劳动法律制度对违约金制度的过度谨慎。在经济新常态下,应当顺应经济社会发展的潮流,对劳动法上的违约金制度进行完善,以回应现实需求。修改的方向是放宽乃至取消服务期和竞业限制之外的违约金禁止;同时,国家应当对劳动关系中的意思自治进行干预,参照合同法的规定对违约金数额作出一定的限制。
The household registration breach penalty clause in our country has different judicial decisions in different jurisdictions,different judgments in different courts in the same jurisdiction,different judgments in the same court in different years,and different judicial decisions in different controversial natures.The judgments on disputes on household registration breaches at various local and different levels of courts stem from the excessive caution of the current liquidity system in China against the liquidated damages system.Under the new normal economic situation,we should comply with the trend of economic and social development and improve the liquidated damages system in labor law in order to respond to actual needs.The direction of revision is to relax or even eliminate liquidated damages in addition to service period and competition restrictions;at the same time,the state should intervene in the autonomy of the autonomy in the labor relations and make certain restrictions on the amount of liquidated damages in accordance with the provisions of the contract law.
作者
郭昌盛
GUO Chang-sheng(Law School,Peking University,Beijing 100871 China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第10期147-163,共17页
Hebei Law Science
基金
北京市社会科学基金项目《供给侧结构性改革中的劳动法问题研究》(16FXC024)
关键词
劳动合同法
违约金制度
户口
司法实践
特殊待遇
labor contract law
penalty system
household registration
judicial practice
special treatment
