摘要
目的探讨改良微创两步截冠法和传统微创两步截冠法拔除水平阻生齿的临床效果。方法 80例水平阻生齿患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,对照组采用传统的微创两步截冠法拔除水平阻生齿,实验组采用改良的微创两步截冠法拔除水平阻生齿,比较两组治疗效果。结果实验组术后局部肿胀程度和疼痛程度均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。但两组拔牙时间及对第二磨牙远中骨壁的影响无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论改良微创两步截冠法拔除水平阻生齿能有效控制术后肿胀,减轻疼痛。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of the modified minimally invasive double cutting method and the traditional minimally invasive double cutting method in removing of the low level of impacted teeth. Methods Eighty patients from Cangzhou Oral Hospital were randomly chosen and divided into two groups: experimental group and control group. The control group used traditional minimally invasive double cutting method in removing of the low level of impacted teeth, while the experimental group used improved minimally invasive double cutting method in removing of the low level of impacted teeth. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference in extraction time and the influence on the distal bone wall of the second molar between the two groups (P>0.05). the differences between the two methods were statistically significant in terms of postoperative response, and subjective tolerance (P <0.05). Conclusion Modified minimally invasive double cutting method removal level tooth impaction can effectively control postoperative swelling and relieve pain.
作者
张圣敏
姚姝博
王宁宁
刘俊红
辛世鹏
ZHANG Shengmin;YAO Zhubo;WANG Ningning;LIU Junhong;XIN Shipeng(Cangzhou Medical College, Cangzhou 061001)
出处
《现代口腔医学杂志》
CAS
2019年第5期300-302,共3页
Journal of Modern Stomatology
基金
沧州市重点研发计划指导项目(183302068)
关键词
水平阻生齿
两步截冠法
微创拔牙
Low level of impacted teeth
Double cutting tooth extraction
Minimally invasive tooth extractio
