摘要
目的探讨对膝关节损伤患者给予早期康复介入干预后获得的临床效果。方法选择该院2017年5月—2019年2月收治的115例膝关节损伤患者作为实验对象;数字奇偶法分组后探究每组膝关节损伤干预方式;比照组(57例):选择传统干预方式展开;实验组(58例):选择传统干预+早期康复介入干预方式展开;比较两组膝关节损伤患者康复优良率、HSS(膝关节功能评分量表)评分结果、WHOQOL-BREF(世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表)评分结果以及干预总满意度差异。结果实验组膝关节损伤患者康复优良率(98.28%)高于比照组(71.93%)明显(χ^2=15.840,P<0.05);干预前,实验组膝关节损伤患者HSS评分同比照组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.019,P>0.05);干预后,实验组膝关节损伤患者HSS评分高于比照组(t=9.280 0,P<0.05);实验组膝关节损伤患者WHOQOL-BREF评分高于比照组明显(t=36.539,36.122,29.757,20.701,P<0.05);实验组膝关节损伤患者干预总满意度(96.55%)高于比照组(73.68%)(χ^2=11.933,P<0.05)。结论膝关节损伤患者于临床接受早期康复介入干预后,对于康复优良率提升,HSS评分提升,WHOQOL-BREF评分提升以及干预总满意程度的提升,均获得明显效果,最终对于膝关节损伤患者康复状态的提升,奠定基础。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of early interventional intervention in patients with knee joint injury. Methods 115 patients with knee joint injuries admitted to our hospital from May 2017 to February 2019 were selected as experimental subjects. The digital parity method was used to investigate the intervention methods of knee injury in each group. The comparison group (57 cases): traditional intervention was selected;experimental group (58 cases): selection of traditional intervention + early rehabilitation interventional intervention;comparison of rehabilitation rate, HSS (knee function score scale) scores of patients with knee joint injury, WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organization's quality of life measurement scale) of the results are summarized and the total satisfaction of the intervention. Results The excellent rate of recovery in patients with knee joint injury in the experimental group (98.28%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (71.93%)(χ^2=15.840,P<0.05). Before the intervention, the HSS scores of patients with knee joint injury in the experimental group were compared. the difference was not statistically significant(t=0.019,P>0.05). After intervention, the HSS scores of patients with knee joint injury in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (t=9.280,P<0.05). The WHOQOL-BREF score was higher in patients with knee joint injury in the experimental group. The comparison group was significantly(t=36.539, 36.122, 29.757, 20.701,P<0.05);the total satisfaction of patients with knee joint injury in the experimental group (96.55%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (73.68%)(χ^2=11.933,P<0.05). Conclusion Patients with knee joint injury have improved the excellent rate of recovery, improved HSS score, improved WHOQOL-BREF score and improved total satisfaction of intervention, and finally recovered for patients with knee joint injury. The improvement of the state lays the foundation.
作者
张杨军
ZHANG Yang-jun(People's Hospital of Nujiang Yi Autonomous Prefecture,Nujiang,Yunnan Province,673100 China)
出处
《世界复合医学》
2019年第8期69-71,共3页
World Journal of Complex Medicine
关键词
早期康复介入
膝关节损伤
临床效果
Early rehabilitation intervention
Knee joint injury
Clinical effect
