摘要
目的探讨支架辅助与非支架辅助栓塞治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤的临床疗效.方法择取2015年6月至2018年10月在本院治疗的60例颅内宽颈动脉瘤患者,采用随机数字表法分为两组,各30例.对照组给予非支架辅助栓塞术治疗,观察组行支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗.对比两组动脉瘤闭塞程度、预后恢复情况及并发症发生情况.结果两组动脉瘤闭塞程度比较,差异无统计学意义;与对照组相比,观察组患者预后恢复优良率较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者并发症发生率较低,但组间比较差异无统计学意义.结论与非支架辅助栓塞治疗相比,采用支架辅助治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤临床效果较好,可有效改善患者病情,预后效果较好,值得临床推广应用.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of stent-assisted and non-stent-assisted embolization for the treatment of intracranial wide-neck aneurysms. Methods Sixty patients with intracranial wide-neck aneurysms treated in our hospital from June 2015 to October 2018 were randomly divided into two groups, with 30 cases in each group. The control group received non-stent-assisted embolization, and the observation group underwent stent-assisted coil embolization. The degree of occlusion of the aneurysm, prognosis and complications were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the degree of occlusion of the aneurysms between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the prognosis of the observation group was higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications was low, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion Compared with non-stent-assisted embolization, stent-assisted treatment of intracranial wide-neck aneurysms has a good clinical effect, which can effectively improve the patient's condition and has a good prognosis. It is worthy of clinical application.
作者
黄海
张宜生
高源
Huang Hai;Zhang Yisheng;Gao Yuan(Department of Intervention, Taizhou People' s Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu, 225300, China)
出处
《当代医学》
2019年第25期92-94,共3页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
支架辅助治疗
非支架辅助栓塞治疗
颅内宽颈动脉瘤
临床疗效
Stent-assisted therapy
Non-stent-assisted embolization
Intracranial wide-neck aneurysm
Clinical efficacy
