期刊文献+

不同分子分型乳腺癌患者预后与淋巴结转移率的相关性分析 被引量:20

Correlation between lymph node metastasis ratio and prognosis of breast cancer with different molecular subtypes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同分子分型乳腺癌患者预后与Ⅱ、Ⅲ期乳腺癌淋巴结转移率的相关性。方法:回顾性分析2011年1月至2016年1月在南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院311例确诊为Ⅱ、Ⅲ期乳腺癌并首选手术治疗的乳腺癌患者的临床资料,依据雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人类表皮生长因子受体-2(HER2)和Ki-67增殖指数分为Luminal A型、Luminal B型、HER2过表达型和三阴型(TNBC)4型。通过卡方检验分析不同分组间患者的临床特征;通过Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评估腋淋巴结转移率(LNR)对各型乳腺癌患者预后的影响,以及相同LNR的不同分子分型的乳腺癌预后的差异,通过Spearman相关分析LNR与Ki-67增殖指数的相关性。结果:不同分子分型在患者年龄、绝经情况、肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态及转移部位等临床特征差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。LNR为0或>0.65的4组分子分型的无病生存时间(DFS)差异无统计学意义(χ^2=3.581、2.808,均P>0.05),LNR介于0.01~0.65的4组分子分型的DFS差异有统计学意义(χ^2=24.366、8.169,均P<0.05)。LNR与Ki-67增殖指数呈正相关(r=0.125,P<0.05)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,乳腺癌患者预后与分子分型(RR=1.179,95%CI=1.023~1.358;χ^2=5.165,P<0.05)、LNR(RR=1.137,95%CI=0.985~0.999;χ^2=5.589,P<0.05)及Ki-67增殖指数(RR=0.992,95%CI=1.022~1.264;χ^2=5.623,P<0.05)有关。结论:LNR是Ⅱ、Ⅲ期乳腺癌预后的重要影响因素,相同LNR的不同分子分型预后差异显著,LNR与Ki-67增殖指数呈正相关。 Objective:To discuss the relationship between lymph node metastasis rate and the prognosis of patients with stageⅡandⅢbreast cancer with different molecular subtypes.Methods:The clinical data of 311 patients diagnosed with stageⅡandⅢbreast cancer,who received preferred surgical treatment in Changzhou Second People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from January 2011 to January 2016,were retrospectively analyzed.According to the levels of estrogen receptor(ER),progesterone receptor(PR),human epidermal growth factor 2(HER2)and Ki-67 proliferation index,the patients were divided into four groups,namely,Luminal A,Luminal B,HER2 over-expression and triple negative breast cancer(TNBC).Chi-square test was used to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients in different groups.Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to evaluate the prognostic impact of axillary lymph node metastasis rate(LNR)on patients with different types of breast cancer,and the prognostic differences among breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes under the same LNR.Spearman correlation was used to analyze the correlation between LNR and Ki-67 proliferation index.Results:There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics of age,menopause,tumor size,lymph node status and metastasis site among BC patients with different molecular subtypes(all P>0.05).There was no significant difference in disease-free survival(DFS)among the four subgroups with LNR of 0 or>0.65(χ^2=3.581,2.808,all P>0.05);and there was significant difference in DFS among the four subgroups with LNR between 0.01 and 0.65(χ^2=24.366,8.169,all P<0.05).LNR was positively correlated with the Ki-67 proliferation index(r=0.125,P<0.05).Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the prognosis of breast cancer patients was related to molecular subtypes(RR=1.179,95%CI=1.023-1.358;χ^2=5.165,P<0.05),LNR(RR=1.137,95%CI=0.985-0.999;χ^2=5.589,P<0.05)and Ki-67 proliferation index(RR=0.992,95%CI=1.022-1.264;χ^2=5.623,P<0.05).Conclusion
作者 裴蓓 成琳 PEI Bei;CHENG Lin(Breast Surgery,Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University,Changzhou 213003,Jiangsu,China)
出处 《中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第7期776-781,共6页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Biotherapy
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81502294) 常州市科技计划项目(No.CJ20159044)~~
关键词 乳腺癌 分子分型 淋巴结转移率 预后 breast cancer molecular subtype lymph node metastasis rate prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献74

  • 1安松林,方志沂,于泳.青年乳腺癌的临床特点及预后[J].实用癌症杂志,2005,20(6):639-642. 被引量:14
  • 2孙红,王浩.Her-2与乳腺癌研究进展[J].现代肿瘤医学,2006,14(3):365-367. 被引量:9
  • 3余科达,狄根红,柳光宇,吴炅,陆劲松,沈坤炜,沈镇宙,邵志敏.原发性双侧乳腺癌预后分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2006,21(1):66-69. 被引量:21
  • 4邬玉辉,何英,唐利立.青年期女性乳腺癌临床病理分析[J].实用预防医学,2006,13(3):545-547. 被引量:8
  • 5全国肿瘤防治研究办公室.中国恶性肿瘤死亡调查研究(1990-1992)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.82-101. 被引量:13
  • 6Gerdes J, Schwab U, Lemke H, et al. Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation [J]. Int J Cancer, 1983, 31 ( 1 ) : 13-20. 被引量:1
  • 7Nishimura R, Osako T, Okumura Y, et al. Ki-67 as a prognostic marker according to breast cancer subtype and a predictor of recurrence time in primary breast cancer [J]. Exp Ther Med, 2010,1(5) :747-754. 被引量:1
  • 8Molino A, Micciolo R, Turazza M, et al. Ki-67 immunostaining in 322 primary breast cancers: associations with clinical and pathological variables and prognosis [J]. Int J Cancer, 1997, 74 (4) :433437. 被引量:1
  • 9Locker AP, Birrell K, Bell JA, et al. Ki67 immunoreactivity in breast carcinoma: relationships to prognostic variables and short term survival[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 1992, 18(3) :224-229. 被引量:1
  • 10Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours[J]. Nature, 2000, 406(6797) :747-752. 被引量:1

共引文献994

同被引文献191

引证文献20

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部