期刊文献+

某肿瘤专科医院Ⅰ类切口手术围手术期预防用抗菌药物合理性点评及经济性分析 被引量:13

Review and economic analysis of preoperative antimicrobial application during the period of type Ⅰ incision operation in a cancer hospital
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:为抗菌药物监管提供相关分析数据,分析评价某肿瘤专科医院2017年Ⅰ类切口手术围手术期预防用抗菌药物情况。方法:对本院2017年期间抽取的共计300例清洁手术病历进行回顾性研究,针对其围手术期抗菌药物预防使用信息以及相关药物成本-效果比等数据进行统计、对比分析。结果:2017年Ⅰ类切口手术围手术期间抗菌药物使用率约为 16.33%;49例使用抗菌药物病历中,以头孢唑林( 55.11%)、头孢呋辛( 28.57%)预防使用为主;预防用抗菌药物DUI值均≤1,单日用药剂量合理;不合理预防用药主要表现在“预防给药品种不适宜”,占总不合理率的 63.64%。结论:从药物经济性角度考虑,头孢唑林是较好的清洁手术围手术期预防性抗菌用药方案。 AIM : To analyze the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and to evaluate the effectiveness of different antimicrobial solutions about type Ⅰ incision operation in a cancer hospital. METHODS : Three-hundred cases of clean surgery in our hospital from January to December in 2017 were involved and the data of the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis were retrospective collected and evaluated.The cost-effectiveness analysis method was applied to compare the ratio of cost to effectiveness between the three solutions. RESULTS :The utilization ratio of antibiotics in clean surgery was 16.33%, which met the hospital requirements. Cefazolin ( 55.11%) and Cefuroxime ( 28.57%) were mainly preventive use in the 49 cases of antibiotics. DUI values of antibiotics for prophylaxis were ≤1, antibiotics dosage for single day was reasonable. The inappropriate use of antibiotics was mainly manifested in “unsuitable varieties”, which accounted for 63.64% of the total irrational rate. CONCLUSION : From the perspective of ecnnomic medication, the preoperative uses of cefazolin in patients treated with clean surgery was a better option.
作者 杨静谟 张波 孙言才 YANG Jingmo;ZHANG Bo;SUN Yancai(Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital,Hefei 230001,Anhui,China;The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC,Division of Life Sciences and Medicine,University of Sciences and Technology of China,Hefei 230001,Anhui,China)
出处 《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 CAS CSCD 2019年第7期821-825,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
关键词 清洁手术 围手术期 抗菌药物 合理用药 成本-效果分析 type Ⅰ incision operation perioperative period antibiotics rational drug use cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献42

  • 1吴久鸿,刘国恩.药物经济学在我国的发展现状及应用前[J].中国药物应用与监测,2005,2(1):1-4. 被引量:20
  • 2无.围手术期预防应用抗菌药物指南[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(23):1594-1596. 被引量:843
  • 3Khan UD, Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection~ comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmenta- tion mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiot- ics prophylaxis duration[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2010, a4 (1) :42-47. 被引量:1
  • 4Parsons DP. Preoperative evaluation and risk management [J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg,2009,2(l) :5-13. 被引量:1
  • 5Oladeinde B,Omoregie R,Olley M,et al.A 5-year surveillance of wound infections at a rural tertiary hospital in Nigeria[J].Afr Health Sci,2013,13(2):351-356. 被引量:1
  • 6Bonds AM,Novick TK,Dietert JB,et al.Incisional negative pressure wound therapy significantly reduces surgical site infection in open colorectal surgery[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2013,56(12):1403-1408. 被引量:1
  • 7Di Benedetto C,Bruno A,Bernasconi E.Surgical site infection:risk factors,prevention,diagnosis and treatment[J].Rev Med Suisse,2013,9(41):1832-1834. 被引量:1
  • 8Ortega-Deballon P,Duvillard L,Scherrer ML,et al.Preoperative adipocytokines as a predictor of surgical infection after colorectal surgery:aprospective survey[J].Int J Colorectal Dis,2013,17(5):523-526. 被引量:1
  • 9KondoK,ChijiiwaK,OhuchidaJ,etal.Selectionofprophylacticantibioticsaccordingtothemicroorganismsisolatedfrom surgicalsiteinfections(SSIs)inapreviousseriesofsurgeriesreducesSSIincidenceafterpancreaticoduodenectomy[J].JHepatobiliaryPan-creatSci,2013,20(3):286-293. 被引量:1
  • 10孟黎辉,董宝坤,龙玉娟.恶性肿瘤术后化疗患儿医院感染危险因素的非条件Logistic回归分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2009,19(12):1518-1520. 被引量:11

共引文献88

同被引文献104

引证文献13

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部