期刊文献+

瘢痕子宫产妇再次妊娠行阴道试产的可行性及影响因素 被引量:4

Feasibility and influencing factors of vaginal trial production for second pregnancy in puerpera with scarred uterus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析瘢痕子宫产妇再次妊娠经阴道试产分娩的可行性与相应的影响因素。方法选取2018年4月~2019年2月本院分娩的瘢痕子宫再次妊娠产妇300例为研究对象;按照随机数字表法结合自愿原则将产妇分成对照组与观察组,每组各150例;对照组予以常规围产期保健及指导措施,观察组在对照组基础上联用体重控制方案,分析组间单因素及多因素结果。结果观察组分娩时间、住院时间均显著缩短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组产前BMI、产时出血量均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率稍低于对照组(P>0.05);A组阴道试产时间均<7h,B组阴道试产时间≥7h者111例、<7h者27例,组间数据比较存在显著性差异(P<0.05);A组妊娠期间母体增加体重<15kg、15~20kg、>20kg与B组间比较,数据存在显著性差异(P<0.05);瘢痕子宫产妇再次妊娠行阴道试产可行性Logistic回归分析多因素包括阴道试产时间、妊娠期间母体增加重量、产时出血量、产前BMI(P<0.05)。结论瘢痕子宫产妇再次妊娠时开展阴道试产存在一定的可行性,阴道试产时间、妊娠期间母体增加体重、产时出血量及产前BMI均为阴道试产可行性的影响因素。 Objective To analyze the feasibility and corresponding influencing factors of vaginal trial production for second pregnancy in the puerpera with scarred uterus. Methods A total of 300 puerpera with scarred uterus who delivered the second time in our hospital from April 2018 to February 2019 were selected as subjects. According to the random number table method combined with the voluntary principle, the puerpera were divided into the control group and the observation group, with 150 cases in each group;the control group was given measures such as routine perinatal care and guidance. The observation group was further given weight control protocol on the basis of the control group. The single-factor and multi-factor results were analyzed between groups. Results The delivery time and length of hospital stay in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05);the prenatal BMI and intrapartum hemorrhage volume in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05);the incidence rate of complications in the observation group was slightly lower than that in the control group(P>0.05);the time of vaginal trial production in group A was <7 h. There were 111 cases in group B with vaginal trial production time ≥7 h and 27 cases with the time <7 h. There were statistically significant differences between the groups(P<0.05);there were statistically significant differences in the gains of maternal body weight <15 kg, 15-20 kg and >20 kg in the group A compared with the group B during pregnancy(P<0.05). According to the Logistic regression analysis, the multiple factors for the vaginal trial production for second delivery in the puerpera with scarred uterus included vaginal trial delivery time, maternal weight gain during pregnancy, intrapartum hemorrhage, and prenatal BMI(P<0.05). Conclusion It is feasible to carry out vaginal trial production for second delivery in the puerpera with scarred uterus. The time of vaginal trial production, maternal weight
作者 李剑红 吴晓玲 LI Jianhong;WU Xiaoling(Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heshan People's Hospital in Guangdong Province, Heshan 529700, China)
出处 《中国现代医生》 2019年第17期63-66,共4页 China Modern Doctor
基金 广东省江门市卫生计生局科研立项项目(18A062)
关键词 瘢痕子宫 再次妊娠 阴道试产 影响因素 Scarred uterus Second pregnancy Vaginal trial production Influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献195

  • 1Liu Y,Li G,Chen Y,et al.A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in China's Mainland[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2014,14:410. 被引量:1
  • 2Selinger H.Maternal request for caesarean section:an ethical consideration[J].J Med Ethics,2014,40(12):857–860. 被引量:1
  • 3刘强,刘华倩,孙雪冰.子宫破裂的高危因素及诊疗现状[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2013,22(6):10315—10320. 被引量:2
  • 4Domr se CM, Geipel A, Berg C,et al. Second-and Third-trimesterter- mrination of Pregnancy in Women with Uterine Scar-u trospectiveanaly- sis of 111 Gemeprostinduced Terminations of Pregnancy Afterprevious Cesarean Delivery[ J]. Contraception ,2012,85 (6) :589-594. 被引量:1
  • 5Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu A M, et al.Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: theWHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health2007-08[J]. Lancet, 2010, 375(9713): 490-499. 被引量:1
  • 6American College of 0, Gynecologists. AGOG Practicebulletin no. 115 : Vaginal birth after previous cesareandelivery [ J ] . Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(2 Pt I );450-463. 被引量:1
  • 7Landon M B, Hauth J C,Leveno K J, ei al. Maternaland perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor af-ter prior cesarean delivery [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2004,351(25) : 2581-2589. 被引量:1
  • 8Macones G A, Cahill A, Pare E, et al. Obstetric out-comes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries : Isvaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?[J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192 ( 4 ):1223-1228. 被引量:1
  • 9Fitzpatrick K E, Kurinczuk J J,Alfirevic Z, et al. U-terine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK : anational case-control study [ J ]. PLoS Med, 2012,9(3); el001184. 被引量:1
  • 10Metz T D, Allshouse A A, Faucett A M, ef al. Valida-tion of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery predictionmodel in women with two prior cesarean deliveries [ J ].Obstet Gynecol, 2015,125(4) : 948-952. 被引量:1

共引文献292

同被引文献19

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部