摘要
国内现行法律尚未专门规定食品安全公益诉讼,但食品公益诉讼与消费公益诉讼有较多重合的内容,因此可以作为其制度构建的参考。消费公益诉讼相关规定明确检察机关和消费者协会可以作为原告提起诉讼,没有赋予食品安全领域可能直接遭受侵害的消费者以及其他社会组织适格当事人资格。食品安全公益诉讼是食品安全治理机制的重要组成部分,作为合作治理的表现形式,具有独特的制度优势。基于民事公益诉讼制度的价值目标和食品安全多元共治的理念,扩大食品安全公益诉讼的主体资格,在消费者个人和社会组织满足相应条件时,赋予其民事公益诉讼原告资格,有助于通过公益诉讼实现最佳的食品安全治理。
The existing laws in China have not specifically stipulated public interest litigation on food safety, but food public interest litigation and consumer public interest litigation have much overlapping content, so it can be used as a reference for the construction of its system. Relevant provisions on consumer public interest litigation clarify that some procuratorates and consumer associations can act as plaintiffs to implement litigation rights, which are both progressive and limited, but stipulate neither consumers who may be directly infringed in the food safety field nor other social organizations. Based on the value purpose of the civil public interest litigation system and the concept of pluralistic governance, consumers and social groups can become plaintiffs in civil public interest litigation under the constraints of corresponding conditions. At the same time, the system design of litigation costs, distribution of burden of proof and compensation should be improved.
作者
段礼乐
高建成
Duan Lile;Gao Jiancheng
出处
《法治社会》
2019年第4期92-101,共10页
Law-Based Society
关键词
规制
食品安全
公益诉讼
原告资格
Regulation
Food Safety
Plaintiff Qualification
Public Interest Litigation
