期刊文献+

监察调查程序与刑事诉讼程序的衔接问题——建立监察调查案件动态分流机制

On the Connection of Investigative Procedure of Supervisory Committee Proceedings and Criminal Proceedings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《监察法》赋予监察机关的调查权是一种糅合了职务违法违纪调查与职务犯罪调查两种不同性质的综合性调查权,这会导致性质混杂的监察调查程序与刑事诉讼程序的衔接存在很大疑难。为了解决监察程序与刑事诉讼程序的衔接问题,应当探索建立一个监察调查案件的性质动态分流机制,将性质不同的监察案件予以分离、分流。而这个动态分流机制,就是建立监察案件“刑事”性质审查机制,即在监察调查程序进行过程中选择几个重要的时间节点对监察案件的性质进行审查认定,从而将不同性质的监察案件导入到程序保障、证明标准和证据要求均不同的监察调查程序当中,使得监察程序能够得到更好的运行。 Investigative power of supervisory committees granted by the Supervisory Law is a hybrid power that integrates two different investigative powers: disciplinary and criminal investigative powers. As a result, it will be difficult to channel the supervisory investigative procedure into the criminal procedure. To solve this problem, this paper attempts to establish a dynamic diversion mechanism to distinguish cases with different nature. This dynamic diversion mechanism is supposed to be implemented via a criminal nature review system. According to this review system, the nature of the cases investigated by supervisory committees will be reviewed at several selected time slots. Thus, cases with different nature can be better accommodated to various investigative procedures within the supervisory committee proceedings, which implement different procedure safeguards, proof standards and proof requirements. This review system will lubricate the operation of the supervisory committee proceedings.
作者 陈诗慧 李利 Chen Shihui;Li Li
机构地区 中山大学法学院
出处 《法治社会》 2019年第4期12-21,共10页 Law-Based Society
关键词 监察机关调查权 刑事立案点 动态分流机制 监察案件“刑事”性质审查机制 Investigative Power of Supervisory Committees Criminal Register Point Dynamic Diversion Mechanism Criminal Nature Review System of Supervisory Cases
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

共引文献523

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部