摘要
通过梳理相关裁判,我们发现法院在审理艺人单方解约案件时的争议焦点集中于演艺经纪合同的性质及艺人有无单方解除权。在经纪公司没有明显的过错以致合同无法履行,不具备《合同法》规定的法定或约定解除条件等前提下,司法实践倾向于将演艺经纪合同认定为综合性合同并限制艺人行使单方解除权。经纪公司可以通过申请禁令、对与艺人合作的第三方提起不正当竞争诉讼或者要求艺人违约赔偿等应对措施维护自身权益。为防控法律风险,经纪公司可通过明确合同性质及违约责任、约定抛却任意解除权,对人身依附性较强的条款和财产性权益条款分开约定等路径优化合同内容。
By reviewing the relevant judgments, we find that the court focuses on two disputes: the nature of the performing brokerage contract and whether the actor has the right to unilaterally terminate the contract, when the judges hear the case of unilateral termination of the contract by the actor.Based on the above disputes, under the premise that the brokerage company makes no such obvious fault thatthe contract cannot be performed, and there are no legal or agreed conditions for terminationas stipulated in the Contract Law ,in judicial practice,it tends to identify the performing brokerage contract as a comprehensive contract and restrict the actor to exercising the right of unilateral termination.The brokerage company can protect its rights and interests by applying for bans, accusingthe third party cooperating with the actorof unfair competition, or demanding compensation for breach of contract by the actor.In order to prevent it from happening, the brokerage company can optimize the contract by clarifying the nature of the contract and the liability for breach of contract, agreeing to abandon the right of arbitrary termination and separately agreeing on the terms with strong personal bondage and the clauses of property rights and interests.
作者
刁云芸
张全伟
DIAO Yunyun;ZHANG Quanwei(Legal Affairs Department, Tencent, Beijing 100089, China)
出处
《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第4期59-65,76,共8页
Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
演艺经纪合同
解除权
行为保全
预期违约
performing brokerage contract
right of termination
behavior preservation
anticipatory breach of contract
