摘要
第三方资助源于英美等国,并在商事仲裁领域逐渐体现其存在价值。然而相关重要议题,如资助本身的合理性、资助者仲裁地位、资助者信息披露范围和第三方资助行业准入条件等,目前尚无定论。从维护经济弱势群体的正当权利,促进仲裁双方地位实质平等的角度出发,该制度应得到充分发展。为了避免资助者对程序的过度干预,形成对资助行为的有效监督,应采取促进资助方与受资助的当事人共担风险、确保资助方信息全面披露、科学评估合理准入条件等限制措施,从而充分发挥仲裁功能,紧贴其价值内核,合理维护仲裁意思自治。
The third-party funding originated from common law states. It gradually reflects its existence value in the field of commercial arbitration. However, related important issues, such as the rationality of this industry per se, the status of the funder in arbitration, the extent of the funder’s information disclosure, and the threshold of access to this industry, are still far from consensus. From the perspective of protecting economical vulnerable groups’legitimate rights and promoting substantial equality of the opposite parties, the third-party funding in commercial arbitration should be fully developed. However, in order to avoid excessive intervention by funders and form effective supervision to funding behavior, some limitations, such as promoting risk sharing of funder and recipient, ensuring the comprehensive information disclosure of funders, scientifically evaluating and reasonably setting the standard of industry access, should be taken so as to fully explore the function of arbitration, get close to the inner value core, and reasonably safeguard the autonomy of arbitration.
出处
《国际商务研究》
北大核心
2019年第4期45-54,共10页
International Business Research
基金
国家社科基金项目“TPP对服务贸易规则的重构及中国对策研究”(项目编号:16BFX198)中期成果
关键词
第三方资助
商事仲裁
程序公正
意思自治
third-party funding
commercial arbitration
due process
party autonomy
