摘要
我国有数千种人文社科类学术期刊,每年刊登的学术论文量巨大,但论文的质量和学术性存在较大差别。考察这些论文的学术性,进一步界定人文社科类学术论文的学术性,探讨其边界问题,是规范学术研究的需要,也是学术自由与学术发展的内在吁求。学术性的特征包括研究性、学科性、理论性、科学性、创新性。文章将从研究者的界定、研究问题的提炼、研究的伦理性和写作表达的规范等方面来探讨人文社科类学术论文的学术边界问题。
There are thousands of academic journals of humanities and social sciences in China,and there are a large number of academic papers published every year,but the quality and academic nature of the papers are quite different.Examining and further defining the academic nature of papers of humanities and social sciences,and discussing the boundary issues are not only necessary for the standardization of academic research,but also for the inherent demand of academic freedom and development.The academic nature includes the quality of being investigative,disciplinary,theoretical,scientific and innovative.This paper discusses the academic boundary of humanities and social sciencespapers from aspects of the definition of researchers,the refinement of research issues,the ethical nature of research and the norms of writing and expression.
作者
张威
谢镒逊
ZHANG Wei;XIE Yixun(Guangxi Journal Media Group,Guilin 541004,China)
出处
《苏州教育学院学报》
2019年第3期101-108,共8页
Journal of Suzhou College of Education
基金
国家新闻出版改革发展项目库项目(OO20181437)
广西壮族自治区文化产业发展专项资金项目“基于期刊资源的融媒体教育服务平台建设”
关键词
人文社科
学术论文
学术性
学术边界
创新
理论
humanities and social sciences
academic papers
academic nature
academic boundary
innovation
theory
