期刊文献+

国家财产权二元立法构造——国家财产权入“典”论要 被引量:6

Theory on National Property Rights Included in the Civil Code——National property rights into the “Canon” theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 公有制宪政制度决定中国民法典不应将国家财产排除在外,实现财产法与公有制的有机耦合应是民法典编纂的价值目标。基于国家所有权与传统物权理论的不兼容性,中国物权法规定国家所有权存在诸多规范漏洞。国家财产归属与利用关系的天然分离是财产权构造的法律逻辑,也是实现公有制与财产法连通的接合点与切入点。为规范各类国家财产的利用关系,中国民法典应设置财产权总则编,并确认国家所有权与国家财产用益权的二元国家财产权的立法构造。 The constitutional government system of the public sector decides that Chinese civil code should not exclude state property.Realizing the organic combination of the property law and the public sector should be the value target of compiling the civil code.Based on the incompatibility of the state ownership and the traditional real right theory,China’s property law has many specification loopholes in providing state ownership.The natural separation of the relationship between state property ownership and utilization is the legal logic of using the property right structure,which is also the joint point and breakthrough point to connect the public ownership property with property law.To regulate the utilization relations of all kinds of state property,Chinese civil code should set the general property rights and ensure the legislative structure of binary state property rights between the state ownership and state property usufructuary.
作者 鲍家志 BAO Jia-zhi(School of Law,Guangxi University for Nationalities,Nanning 530006 China)
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期62-72,共11页 Hebei Law Science
基金 鲍家志主持的2016年度国家哲学社会科学基金后期资助项目<非经营性国有资产使用权研究>(16FFX026)的阶段性成果 鲍家志主持的广西民族大学2018年引进人才科研启动项目(人文社科类)<国家财产权的立法构造>(2018SKQD38)的阶段性成果
关键词 民法典 国家财产 国家所有权 国家财产权 财产权总则 the civil code state property state ownership national property rights the general property rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

同被引文献128

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部