摘要
本文研究表明,司法机关对股份量化纠纷的总体立场比较消极,集体成员维权失败具有普遍性,其中最为突出的争议焦点是纠纷可诉性、成员资格认定、方案效力审查和股份量化依据等问题。从裁判理据看,集体成员自治原则是法院处理此类纠纷的核心理据,实际上并不能为案件处理提供有效的规则指引,对该原则的误读误用是司法立场出现认知偏差的主要根源。要解决司法对股份量化纠纷应否介入及如何介入的问题,必须遵循团体法逻辑重构其司法范式,即以团体法属性为股份量化改革的私法语境,以股份量化行为的法律性质为主要理据,重点是按照效力规则审查方案效力并据以裁判个案。
Empirical research shows that the judicial organs have a negative overall position on the stock quantification disputes,and the failure of collective members to safeguard their rights is universal.Among them,the most prominent controversial focus is the lawsuit of disputes,membership identification,program effectiveness review and stock quantification basis.Judgment grounds show that the principle of collective member autonomy is the core reason for courts to deal with such disputes.In fact,it can not provide effective rules for case handling.Misreading and misuse of the principle is the main source of cognitive bias in judicial position.In order to solve the problem of whether and how to intervene in the disputes of stock quantification,we must follow the logic of group law to reconstruct its judicial paradigm,that is,to take the attributes of group law in the reform of stock quantification as the private law context,to take the legal nature of stock quantification as the main rationale,and to focus on identifying the validity of the scheme in accordance with the rules of resolution validity.Take the referee case.
出处
《农业经济问题》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期30-45,共16页
Issues in Agricultural Economy
基金
国家社科基金项目“农村集体资产股份化改革中农民股权法律制度构建研究”(编号:16BFX160),国家社科基金项目“农村集体经济组织特别法人制度构造研究”(编号:18BFX112)
教育部人文社科研究青年项目“农村集体经济组织成员权的体系构建及其实现机制研究”(编号:14YJC820080)
安徽省社科项目“农村集体资产股份权的法理构造及其实现机制研究”(编号:AHSKY2015D30)
安徽省高校人文社会科学重大研究项目(编号:SK2014ZD002)
关键词
农村集体资产
股份量化改革
裁判文书
司法范式
Rural collective assets
Quantitative reform of shares
Judicial documents
Judicial paradigm
