期刊文献+

考虑政府补贴的不同渠道权力结构的混合汽车定价决策研究

On Pricing Decision-making of Hybrid Vehicles with Different Channel Power Structures of Government Subsidies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在政府实施电动汽车定额补贴基础上,通过引入不同渠道权利结构设计,构建制造商主导、零售商主导以及同时决策三种模型,并借助数值仿真等方法展开定价决策、经济效益、环境效益及社会福利值分析。结果发现,供应链渠道的主导者拥有绝对优势,可以实现自身利润最大化,但却是以追随者的利益为代价的;同时还发现,虽然供应链的总利润、消费者剩余和社会福利数值可以取得最高值,但是该模型对环境影响也是最大的。 On the basis of the government fixed subsidies for electric vehicles, this paper introduces the design of different channel power structure, establishes three models, i.e., manufacturer-led, retailer-led, and simultaneous decision-making. With numerical simulation, the present paper analyzes the optimal pricing decision-making, economic benefits, environment impact and social welfare values. The results indicate that leader in the manufacturer-led or retailer-led models in the supply channel has an absolute advantage and can maximize their own profits at the expense of the follower’ interests. In addition, although the total profit of supply chain, consumer surplus, and social welfare values of the simultaneous decision-making model can achieve the highest value, this model has the greatest environment impact.
作者 李正红 林海燕 郑小雪 LI Zheng-hong;LIN Hai-yan;Zheng Xiao-xue(School of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350100, China)
出处 《井冈山大学学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第3期91-99,共9页 Journal of Jinggangshan University(Social Sciences)
基金 福建省社会科学规划项目“福建省跨境电商企业与物流服务商双边匹配问题研究”(项目编号:FJ2016C025) 福建省中青年教师教育科研项目“互联网+环境下文化产业大数据服务平台构建研究”(项目编号:JAS170151)
关键词 渠道权利结构 定价决策 政府补贴 电动汽车 传统汽车 channel power structure pricing decisions government subsidies electric vehicle traditional vehicle
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献58

  • 1Michael,M.,Fisher,Frank,E.Mark,Tony,Kingsbury,Jurgen,Vehlow,Takashi,Yamawaki,赵明,温雪峰,李金惠.废电子电气产品塑料可持续再生过程中的能量回收(上)[J].家电科技,2005(11):46-48. 被引量:1
  • 2马士华,王鹏.基于Shapley值法的供应链合作伙伴间收益分配机制[J].工业工程与管理,2006,11(4):43-45. 被引量:163
  • 3Calef D,Goble R.The Allure of Technology:How France and California Promoted Electric and Hybrid Vehicles to reduce Urban air Pollution[J].Policy Sciences,2007,40(1):1-34. 被引量:1
  • 4Li S.Exploring the History of New Energy Vehicles[M].Advances in Automation and Robotics,Vol.2.Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2012.141-146. 被引量:1
  • 5Gong H,Wang M Q,Wang H.New Energy Vehicles in China:Policies,Demonstration and Progress[J].Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change,2013,18(2):207-228. 被引量:1
  • 6Yuan X,Liu X,Zuo J.The Development of New Energy Vehicles for a Sustainable Future:A Review[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2015(42):298-305. 被引量:1
  • 7Raslaviius L,Azzopardi B,Kerys A et al.Electric Vehicles Challenges and Opportunities:Lithuanian Review[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2015(42):786-800. 被引量:1
  • 8Chen L,Yan G,Zhang Y.Strategy Planning for State-Owned New Energy Vehicle Industry of China[C].The 19thInternational Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2013.1047-1057. 被引量:1
  • 9Oraiopoulos N, Ferguson M E, Toktay L B. Relicensingas a secondary market strategy[J]. Management Science,2012, 58(5): 1022-1037. 被引量:1
  • 10Kim K, Chhajed D. Commonality in product design: Costsaving, valuation change and cannibalization[J]. EuropeanJ of Operational Research, 2000, 125(3): 602-621. 被引量:1

共引文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部