摘要
个人隐私公开豁免条款兼具定义规范和权限规范的双重特征,定义规范确定了条款的适用范围,个人隐私定义本身构成公开豁免的内在界限;权限规范赋予行政机关对何为"对公众利益造成重大影响"的裁量权限,公共利益的判准成为公开豁免的外在界限,双重界限的背后是隐私权与知情权的利益衡量与价值取舍。大数据时代中传统隐私权转向信息性隐私权的同时,界定"个人隐私"概念的关键应从"隐私"转向"识别"。在类型学和隐私保护领域阶层理论的基础上,在识别后果不同的"个人隐私"与重要性不同的"公共利益"之间进行基于比例原则的精细化利益衡量,才能发挥该条款的规范功能和实用价值。
The exemption clause for disclosure of personal privacy takes on double characteristics of definition norm and authority norm.The definition norm has determined the applicable scope of the clause and the definition of personal privacy itself constitutes the internal boundary for disclosure exemption;the authority norm gives the administrative body discretionary power regarding what is "significant impact on public interest", and the judgment of public interest turns into the external boundary for disclosure exemption.What lies behind the double boundaries is the balancing of interest and value between the right of privacy and the right to know.On the basis of the hierarchical theories in the typology and privacy protection fields, the norm function of the clause can be realized only when personal privacy with different identification results and public interest with different degrees of importance are measured in a refined manner and pursuant to the principle of proportionality.
作者
蔡星月
CAI Xing-yue(China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 100088)
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第3期134-144,共11页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究重点课题<大数据与网络安全立法研究>(18SFB1005)
关键词
政府信息公开
个人隐私
识别
公共利益
比例原则
Disclosure of Government Information
Personal Privacy
Identification
Public Interest
Principle of Proportionality
