期刊文献+

基于职业能力的全日制工程硕士培养模式实证研究

Empirical study on cultivation mode of full-time engineering masters based on professional competence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全日制工程硕士职业能力标准是高等工程教育进行人才培养的重要依据。从我国对高层次应用复合型工程人才需求的现实出发,基于职业知识与技能、职业潜能、情境性综合能力、职业素养4个维度的全日制工程硕士职业能力,对培养环境、培养过程、学习投入、职业能力之间的因果关系进行实证研究,探索全日制工程硕士培养的作用机制。 Full-time Engineering Master's professional competence standard is an important basis for higher engineering education personnel training.Based on the reality of the demand for high-level composite engineering talents in our country,according to the four dimensions of vocational knowledge and skills,occupational potential,comprehensive situation ability and professional accomplishment of full-time master's engineering ability,this paper conducts the empirical study of the cause-effent relationship among the investment in study,profession ability,cultivation environment and process to explore the role of full-time master of engineering training mechanism.
作者 孙卫忠 李亚函 邵艳芳 Sun Wei-zhong;Li Ya-han;Shao Yan-fang(School of Economics and Management,Hebei University of Technology,Tianjin 300401,China)
出处 《教学研究》 2019年第1期89-97,共9页 Research in Teaching
基金 河北省(教育厅)高等学校人文社会科学研究重点项目(SD161031)
关键词 职业能力 全日制工程硕士 培养模式 实证研究 vocational ability full-time master of engineering training mode empirical research
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1李锐,凌文辁.工作投入研究的现状[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(2):366-372. 被引量:132
  • 2邓光平.我国专业学位设置政策的价值取向分析[J].江苏高教,2007(6):81-83. 被引量:8
  • 3MASLACH C, SCHAUFELI W B, LEITER M P. Job Burnout [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001, 52: 397-422. 被引量:1
  • 4SCHAUFELI W B, MARTINEZ A, MARQUES P, SALANOVA M, BAKKER A B. Burnout and engagement in university students:A cross-national study [J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2002, 33(5):464-481. 被引量:1
  • 5FREDRICKS J A,BLUMENFELD P C,PARIS A H. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence[J]. Review of Educational Research, 2004, 74: 59-109. 被引量:1
  • 6RAVINDRAN B, GREENE B A, DEBACKER T K. Predicting preservice teachers' cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs [J]. Journal of Educational Research, 2005, 98: 222-232. 被引量:1
  • 7NCSE. Quantifying School Engagement: Research Report [R]. National Center for School Engagement. Colorado Foundation for Families and Children, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 8KUH G D, BRIDGES B K, HAYEK J C. What matters to student success: A review of the Literature [R]. National Postsecondary Education Cooperative (NPEC) Commissioned Paper, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 9PIKE G R. Measuring quality: A comparison of US News rankings and NSSE benchmarks [J]. Research in Higher Education, 2004, 45 (2): 193-208. 被引量:1
  • 10LANASA S M, CABRERA A F. TRANGSRUD H. The construct validity of student engagement: A confirmatory factor analysis approach [J]. Res High Educ, 2009, 50: 315-332. 被引量:1

共引文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部